New York State is making historic higher education investments.
As part of the 2026 budget proposal, Gov. Kathy Hochul proposes free community college for people ages 25 to 55. Not only would it cover tuition costs, but also books, supplies and other fees. Implementing the measure would allow New York to join a legion of states with similar policies.
Jeff Smink, deputy director of The Education Trust New York, predicted it would bolster the growing semiconductor workforce and other high-demand fields.
"To get some of these high-paying jobs, you need a skilled workforce," Smink pointed out. "I think the investment in community colleges -- and SUNY (State University of New York), CUNY (City University of New York) -- is going to help get us that workforce, particularly for students of color, students from low-income backgrounds that might not have had these opportunities in the past."
It is one thing to get into college, but it is quite another to finish. Money is often the reason people do not finish and student loan debt can hold people back from making bigger financial moves. The Education Data Initiative reported New York has around 2.5 million student loan borrowers with nearly $95 billion in student loan debt.
College investments can only benefit people with a strong educational foundation. Smink noted free community college could reduce the number of students who have to take remedial college classes since they did not get the same knowledge in high school. He thinks New York's budget proposal needs more investment in literacy instruction.
"Part of the problem is students who are getting their teaching certification are not taught how to teach reading aligned with the science," Smink contended. "There's some efforts happening there but we'd have liked to see some funding to help SUNY teacher preparation programs align their instruction, so that when teachers get into the classroom they're already prepared and won't need any extra support or reteaching."
New York State has one of the worst literacy rates in the country. National scores for the state's fourth and eighth grade students show declines in reading and math proficiency which have continued to slip since the pandemic.
get more stories like this via email
An attorney for a small, rural Michigan college said she expected lawsuits over the "Dear Colleague" letter schools received last month from the U.S. Department of Education's Office for Civil Rights.
The American Federation of Teachers and American Sociological Association filed one of the first lawsuits to challenge the agency's threat to withhold federal funding from schools that teach about systemic racism or diversity-related topics.
Karen Bennett, legal counsel for Alpena Community College, shared her prediction with the school's Board of Trustees at a recent meeting.
"I think colleges around the country are gathering their thoughts about what actions to take and I'm sure we'll see lots of development in this area, in litigation," Bennett explained. "This is all subject to ongoing litigation."
The letter was issued on Feb. 14 with a Feb. 28 deadline to comply. Bennett advised Alpena's Board to take no action, stating it does not apply to them because the school has no admissions policies other than accepting individuals who apply.
Bennett pointed out she has found only one DEI reference on a college website. Ironically, it was a 2020 Trump-era policy which required schools to post DEI and sexual misconduct training information. The school was told it was no longer necessary after amendments in 2024, however, Bennett said the policy must now be reinstated as a requirement.
"It's impossible to meet or keep up with these, in my opinion, ridiculous edicts that are coming out on almost a daily basis," Bennett contended. "I don't see how we can possibly completely comply, because they're mutually contradictory."
The federal government maintains discrimination based on race, color or national origin is illegal for federally funded institutions and claims DEI policies have discriminated against white and Asian students. Other lawsuits have also been filed challenging the policy change.
get more stories like this via email
A new report says North Dakota's five tribal colleges contribute nearly $170 million to the state's economy. But any positive news is overshadowed by the Trump administration's budget-cutting tone and the potential harm to campuses. The data was issued this week by the North Dakota Tribal College System, which says between 2022 and 2023, North Dakotans saw added tax revenue and public-sector savings of more than $30 million because of daily operations at these schools.
Tracey Bauer, North Dakota Tribal College System executive director, said alumni add even more economic activity when they work in their communities after graduation. But she warns a lot might change if federal cuts reach them.
"It's going to possibly lead to staff layoffs, increases in tuition - to kind of make up some of that lost funding, [and] even campus program closures," she said.
Bauer said tribal colleges are largely funded by federal grants. In addition to freezing a range of federal aid, President Donald Trump wants to eliminate the Department of Education, which administers programs that support campuses in Native communities. Among other things, he claims higher education is overtaken by a "woke" agenda. But some of his budget-cutting actions are being challenged in court or face other constitutional hurdles.
The American Indian College Fund stresses that tribal colleges should be exempt from executive orders due to treaty and trust obligations of the federal government.
Cheryl Crazy Bull, president and CEO of the American Indian College Fund, said as the uncertainty unfolds, organizations like hers are preparing to help these schools adjust.
"Providing resources for institutions to hire adjunct faculty, or helping students with transfer programming," she said.
These leaders say colleges and universities serving Native populations were set up to provide a more cultural and welcoming learning environment, while giving students flexibility to overcome barriers to enrolling. Bauer says these campuses are still in their "infancy" stage compared with mainstream higher-ed institutions, and the sudden budget shift might derail progress.
"It wasn't until the late [19]60s and early '70s that we were able to get tribal colleges established across the country. And so, not having that opportunity to provide education for our young people would be devastating," Bauer added.
And it's not just young adults, with Bauer noting they also serve a lot of working parents who might not be able to travel to another school if their campus shuts down.
get more stories like this via email
Ohio Senate Bill 1 is drawing strong reactions across the state, particularly from students in higher education. The bill, which its supporters say aims to promote institutional neutrality, has been met with vocal opposition from students and faculty who argue it threatens academic freedom.
Clara Conover, lead organizer at the Ohio Student Association, points to the overwhelming response against the bill.
"There has not been one single public university student testifying for this bill or openly supporting it. And I think that that goes a really long way to represent how harmful Senate Bill 1 would be for higher ed," she explained.
Despite strong student opposition, proponents of SB 1 argue that the legislation is necessary to ensure political neutrality in classrooms and prevent ideological bias. The bill, introduced by Sen. Jerry Cirino, R-Columbus, would restrict diversity-related programs and require universities to remain neutral on controversial topics.
As the debate over SB 1 continues, students have been actively protesting its progression through the Legislature. The Ohio Student Association recently staged a silent protest at the Statehouse, symbolizing what they describe as grief over the bill's potential impact. Conover emphasized the broader implications of this legislation.
"This bill would make our universities ... like, it would drive students out of Ohio and then it would make sure that no one else came here for college 'cause no one wants to go to the Jim Crow state, the modern one where you can't learn what everyone else around you is learning in different states," he said.
SB 1 remains under consideration in the Ohio Senate despite strong opposition. Wednesday's committee vote followed more than eight and a half hours of testimony, with more than 800 pieces of opponent testimony submitted.
get more stories like this via email
Contact
