By Dawn Attride for Sentient Climate.
Broadcast version by Edwin J. Viera for Connecticut News Service reporting for the Sentient-Public News Service Collaboration

Since President Donald J. Trump’s inauguration on Monday, public health officials have found themselves at a confusing — and potentially dangerous — standstill. On a global scale, the newly elected president has pulled the U.S. out of the World Health Organization (WHO), and now, has paused external communications for a number of government agencies. The move comes at a critical time for public health as human cases of bird flu have slowly increased, resulting in one death earlier this month, and a number of former public health officials have said the government is not testing enough for bird flu.

The sudden freeze means agencies like The Center for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) and Food and Drug Administration (FDA) are unable to release communications such as scientific reports and health updates. Of particular concern: the pause has no concrete end date, which has left agency employees “confused” on its scope, according to The Washington Post.

Key Public Health Meetings and Research Canceled

Among the fallout is the cancellation of National Institute of Health (NIH) grant review panels, study sections and an indefinite ban on travel. “Asking for a pause on issuing new policy or regulations is reasonable while the new administration settles in, but a blanket freeze on all communications is unusual and could impair critical functions like outbreak response,” Sarah Sorscher, director of regulatory affairs for the Center for Science in the Public Interest, tells Sentient.

These specific measures for health agencies are worrying researchers nationwide, who have taken to social media platforms to air their experiences and frustrations. “All NIH study sections canceled indefinitely. This will halt science and devastate research budgets in universities,” writes Prof. Jane M. Liebschutz on BlueSky.

“Above and beyond the immediate fear and confusion that this freeze and communication blackout has caused, the longstanding implications will largely be determined by how long this situation lasts (I’ve seen insider estimates of February 1) and what is removed from NIH during the freeze,” Daniel P. Moriarity, an assistant professor of psychology at the University of Pennsylvania, writes to Sentient in an email. Interruption of NIH funding, for example, “could have direct consequences on the availability of physicians and clinicians to provide health care,” he writes.

While it’s unclear how long this freeze will last, the 2025 presidential advisory meeting on combating antibiotic-resistant bacteria scheduled for January 28 and 29 has been canceled, indicating the pause could continue for quite some time.

How Will the ‘Pause’ Affect Public Health Warnings?

It appears the freeze is already delaying CDC publications, such as their main weekly report that provides the public with timely health advice and research. This week’s iteration — scheduled for earlier this week –– has not yet been published and was supposed to include new studies and data on the ongoing H5N1 avian influenza virus outbreak. This is not the first time these CDC reports have been affected by the Trump administration — in 2020, officials at the HHS tried to “change, delay and prevent” such reports, particularly those related to COVID-19.

There is also ambiguity as to the breadth of the communications covered, according to a Center for Science in the Public Interest statement, which could hinder agency coordination during an outbreak of foodborne illness. 

A spokesperson for the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) tells Sentient that a pause on communications and public appearances are “not directly related to emergencies or critical to preserving health.” They also said, “This is a short pause to allow the new team to set up a process for review and prioritization. There are exceptions for announcements that HHS divisions believe are mission critical, but they will be made on a case-by-case basis.” A representative for the CDC declined to comment.

Halting Agency Coordination Could Exacerbate Bird Flu Outbreaks

The shutdown of external agency communications and delayed report from the CDC on key bird flu updates comes at a critical time for vital health messaging between federal agencies and the public, considering the current outbreaks. 

Avian flu has been circulating on factory farms, where the virus can spread through direct contact between workers and animals or droppings between infected (usually wild) birds and farm animals. The close-quarter conditions of factory farms makes them particularly susceptible to outbreaks, requiring stringent biosecurity protocols to stop the spread. Although rare, humans can get bird flu by coming into contact with infected animals, which is why dairy workers are largely affected by the current H5N1 strain, which has infected cow herds in 16 states, mainly California. So far, 67 humans have been sickened and one person has died from bird flu in the U.S.

At present, the current strain of avian flu cannot spread human-to-human, but this may change if the virus mutates, which is why epidemiologists rely on accurate data from agencies like the CDC to track the spread. Another cause for concern is raw milk, which has been found to contain the virus but so far has only infected animals who consumed it.

As the pause only came into effect Tuesday, it remains to be seen how long this directive among federal health agencies will continue to hinder key reports, research and public health information.


Dawn Attride wrote this article for Sentient.


get more stories like this via email

Some Kentucky lawmakers want to make it mandatory for some Medicaid participants in Kentucky to work, but experts say that would disproportionately affect people with mental health or substance use disorders.

House Bill 695 would require able-bodied adults with no dependents to work - and prove it - to receive health care.

Kentucky currently has a voluntary program, with job training and opportunities for community engagement, but Emily Beauregard - executive director of Kentucky Voices for Health - explained it isn't required for Medicaid eligibility.

"The majority of Kentuckians with Medicaid coverage are already working," said Beauregard. "They're working full time, part time. They're students, they're caregivers, taking care of children or older family members, people with disabilities."

Supports of work requirements argue the current system incentivizes people not to work, and argue the change will help alleviate staffing shortages.

Meanwhile, Congress is considering deep cuts to Medicaid, around $880 million over the next decade.

Groups like the Kentucky Center for Economic Policy say that would disproportionately affect Kentucky, which is one of the top ten states for the share of its population covered by Medicaid.

Valerie Lebanion teaches local parenting classes in Whitley County. She said most of her clients rely on Medicaid for health coverage.

She said she believes increased red tape around the program would end up hurting families.

"When moms and dads are sick, they can't take care of their children," said Lebanion. "They can't take their children to school, get their children off to where they need to be, or even to take care of their children."

Beauregard said the state would also end up paying more for the administrative work needed to track and document mandatory work requirements.

"It doesn't make sense economically," said Beauregard, "and it puts an additional burden on hard-working Kentucky families who are doing everything right and end up falling through paperwork cracks."

A recent poll from the health policy and research organization KFF found 96% of participants said Medicaid is either important or very important to their community - and 82% said lawmakers should leave Medicaid spending unchanged or increase funding.

Tensions are rising in Ohio between doulas and the state Board of Nursing, as only a small number of doulas have been able to be certified for Medicaid reimbursement - despite a statewide push to reduce infant mortality.

More than 60,000 births in Ohio each year are covered by Medicaid. Research shows having a doula can lower risks for both moms and babies.

But only 132 doulas statewide are certified to receive Medicaid payments.

Dr. Marie McCausland, who chairs the state's Doula Advisory Group, said to meet the demand, about 3,000 need to be certified.

But she contended the certification process has been anything but collaborative - and called it "top-down and exclusionary."

"Day one, the first meeting, they already had almost all the rules written," said McCausland. "They sent it to us and we were supposed to start there, versus any sort of collaborative writing of the rules."

She said she recently discovered she's being removed as chair after a quiet legislative change that stripped doulas of their ability to lead the advisory group, effective April 9.

The Ohio Board of Nursing said in a statement the leadership change was made for consistency with other professions.

But McCausland said even doulas serving non-Medicaid families are sometimes being turned away, because they don't hold the new certification.

Guillermo Bervejillo, research manager with Children's Defense Fund Ohio, said the governor made doula access a priority, but the Board of Nursing may be undermining that effort.

"Gov. DeWine made it a priority to reduce infant mortality, especially amongst Black children," said Bervejillo. "He created a doula advisory group. The doula advisory group has faced obstacle after obstacle. It's been kind of wild. It feels like the governor doesn't even know what's going on."

McCausland said there also are concerns about racial bias and representation.

She said Black voices on the advisory group have been ignored, even scrubbed from official meeting records - prompting the group to hire a court reporter.

"Doulas are happy to come into hospital systems and work with doctors and nurses," said McCausland. "We want to be able to work as a team for our client success."

The Board of Nursing says it values the input of doulas and that the advisory group includes health professionals from a range of backgrounds.

The board says it is committed to improving maternal health outcomes and continuing to refine the certification process.

This week, workers who provide in-home and nursing home care rallied against cuts to Medicaid.

Washington's Medicaid, known as Apple Health, covers nearly 2 million low-income people in the state, including the majority of nursing home residents. Service Employees International Union Local 775 is the union representing long-term care workers who assist seniors and people with disabilities, in their homes and in nursing facilities.

Adam Glickman, secretary-treasurer of SEIU 775, said caregivers help with such essential tasks as cooking, bathing, medication management and transportation. He emphasized cutting Medicaid would mean many would not get the care they need.

"That could mean they're left alone in their homes, without care," Glickman pointed out. "For many people, it'll mean ending up in emergency rooms."

President Donald Trump and House Republicans are proposing $880 billion in cuts from the Energy and Commerce Committee, most of which would come from Medicaid. Critics said the goal of the plan is to help pay for tax cuts that would largely benefit the wealthiest Americans.

Kandie Luo, a caregiver and union member who depends on Medicaid for her own family's health care, as well as for her income, emigrated from China 40 years ago and thinks cuts to Medicaid would especially harm immigrant communities.

"This is not just about the number, it's about the real people," Luo stressed. "About the family, like me, depending on the Medicaid to survive."

The Trump administration said Medicaid cuts would focus on reducing waste and fraud in the program. Glickman contended it is an issue that has been blown out of proportion.

"I think this has become a red herring or kind of smoke screen by people who just really don't want to admit that what they're doing is cutting people's health care," Glickman argued.

A new poll from the health research organization KFF confirmed Medicaid's popularity across the country, with only 17% of Americans supporting cuts to the program.