El Congreso se está preparando para aprobar un proyecto de ley que dificultará a millones de ciudadanos de Tennessee registrarse y votar.

La Ley de Protección de la Elegibilidad de los Votantes Estadounidenses (SAVE, por sus siglas en inglés) exigiría que una persona presente una prueba de ciudadanía al registrarse para votar.

La presidenta de la Liga de Mujeres Votantes de Tennessee, Debby Gould, dice que su organización se opone firmemente al proyecto de ley porque crea barreras que podrían privar de sus derechos a los votantes, especialmente a las mujeres casadas, al exigir documentación original para registrarse.

"Su prueba de matrimonio, porque van a tener que demostrar, por ejemplo, si una mujer cambió su apellido cuando se casó, va a tener que mostrar prueba legal de que el nombre ha sido cambiado porque ya no coincide con el certificado de nacimiento," enfatizó Gould.

La liga dice que más de 21 millones de estadounidenses no pueden acceder fácilmente a los documentos necesarios de acuerdo a la Ley SAVE, según el Centro para la Democracia y el Compromiso Cívico (Center for Democracy and Civic Engagement).

Gould agrega que si se aprueba la Ley SAVE, el registro de votantes en línea perderá su conveniencia, ya que los votantes deben presentar los documentos originales en persona antes de votar, lo que limita opciones como el voto por correo.

Gould además indica que millones de votantes elegibles de Tennessee no podrán proporcionar los documentos necesarios para demostrar su ciudadanía si se ven afectados por un desastre natural.

"Después del huracán Helene, la gente se apresuró a conseguir su documentación nuevamente porque se habían perdido muchas cosas. Va a ser un verdadero desafío. Y, como saben, la Liga de Mujeres Votantes (League of Women Voters) tiene muy claro que queremos que todas las personas que son elegibles para votar puedan hacerlo," insistió también la entrevistada.

Gould señala que muchas personas se verían afectadas debido al acceso limitado a los documentos necesarios. Este problema se hace evidente en la implementación de la identificación real en Tennessee, ya que a pesar de la fecha límite de mayo, solo 2,9 millones de los 5,8 millones de conductores con licencia han obtenido una.

El apoyo para este informe fue proporcionado por Carnegie Corporation de Nueva York.


get more stories like this via email

Republicans in Washington, D.C. remain focused on greatly reducing federal spending. However, a backlash is mounting in Congressional districts, including Minnesota, and some constituents feel ignored. Whether it's executive orders by the Trump administration or budget votes taking shape in Congress, the dramatic downsizing of federal agencies, programs and services has led to heightened concern about the impact on a host of populations.

Brian Vroman, a Grand Rapids resident, said he's worried about the possibility of steep Medicaid cuts. He says even if it's uncomfortable for House Republicans, they still should have face-to-face conversations.

"There's a lot of pent-up anger, frustration and I think that the only way to alleviate that is to have open dialogue. We're not at war with each other," he explained.

Vroman's congressman, Rep. Pete Stauber, R-Duluth, could not be reached for comment. Protesters have gathered outside his office to demand a town hall. GOP leaders have urged a pause on such events to avoid the backlash while painting attendees of recent meetings as "paid activists." Vroman is part of a left-leaning grassroots group, but says he's not paid for his actions and has voted for both parties.

Sarah Jaynes, executive director of the Rural Democracy Initiative, said it's reasonable for voters in conservative districts, including those who consistently vote Republican, to feel blindsided by some of these moves and demand answers. She feels some of the organizing is having an effect.

"[Some] members of Congress are quietly speaking up, and ensuring that funding is continuing to move into their communities," she said.

National political publications have reported that some House GOP members have had "back channel" conversations with the White House to reverse cuts led by Trump adviser Elon Musk. While Democrats have criticized the manner and scope of spending reductions, they too are facing pressure to host more meetings to highlight voter frustration. Some Democrats are now holding town halls in GOP districts.

With Pennsylvania's primary election set for May 20, a nonpartisan group is working to raise awareness about voter registration.

Over 8.7 million Pennsylvanians are eligible to vote in municipal elections.

Amy Widestrom - the executive director of the League of Women Voters of Pennsylvania - said she is concerned about low turnout in local races, noting Montgomery County's 41.9% turnout in 2023.

She says one precinct saw less than 1% - only 379 voters. She emphasized the importance of voting for key positions.

"These are the people that are doing the business of our local counties and our local schools and our local judges and our state courthouses," said Widestrom. "And so these are extraordinarily important elections. And yet, in 2023 for the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, we only got a 35% turnout."

She adds Pennsylvanians must register to vote by May 5 to cast a ballot in the primary, and the last day to apply for a mail-in-ballot is May 13.

Widestrom said low voter turnout has been an ongoing issue, especially in off-cycle elections like primaries and odd-year general elections.

She added that the League will host civic engagement events to educate voters on upcoming races.

"We'll be hosting a series of webinars called ballot box basics, highlighting both the importance of these municipal elections, but also, how do you learn about these candidates?" said Widestrom. "So we're going to host a webinar on judging our judges. How do we learn about the judicial candidates?"

Widestrom added that the League will be updating their website at Vote411.org with statewide candidate information before Pennsylvanians head to the polls or mail in their ballot.

More testimony was heard yesterday about term limit reforms in North Dakota, an issue voters around the state might have to decide again.

In 2022, North Dakota voters approved imposing term limits for state lawmakers and the governor. Legislators can no longer serve more than eight years in the House and Senate.

But a handful of bills this session call for another ballot question, to raise state lawmakers' term limit to 12 years.

Sen. Justin Gerhardt, R-Mandan, sponsor of one bill, said the new framework threatens the value of experience at the State Capitol.

"Our citizen-led Legislature meets for only 80 days every two years," Gerhardt pointed out. "By the time a new legislator gets a handle on the budget process, legislative rules and the needs of their district, they're already on their way out the door."

He added his bill also addresses the issue of lawmakers who are appointed to fill a seat. Opponents said the moves undermine the will of the voters.

A separate bill proposing a new statewide vote on the prospective changes will be heard this morning. If one of the measures advances to the ballot, it likely would come up in the 2026 general election.

Those who want term limits said they foster fresh voices in policymaking.

Kevin Herrmann, a resident of Beulah, is one of the many people to testify against the new reform efforts.

"This resolution is a way for legislators to get back their legislative power over the citizens of North Dakota," Herrmann contended.

Another thorny element to this debate is, the 2022 ballot question included language prohibiting state lawmakers from trying to force the issue down the road. One of the bills in question repeals the language in trying to get the question back on the ballot. Backers of the proposals acknowledge they are likely to draw court challenges over constitutional arguments.

Support for this reporting was provided by The Carnegie Corporation of New York.


get more stories like this via email