North Carolina lawmakers in Congress received mixed marks in the new League of Conservation Voters scorecard.

The scorecard ranks members of Congress on their 2024 votes. North Carolina's senators received zero grades. House members fared better, at 47%.

Dan Crawford, director of governmental relationship at the North Carolina League of Conservation Voters, said 2024 was the tale of two leaders for the state in Congress.

"You have ones that care about clean air, clean water and protecting the North Carolina natural landscape," he said, "and then you have other types of leaders that want to protect the profits of polluters and choose not to support democracy."

Votes considered in the scorecard broke down into five categories: climate, conservation, democracy, 'dirty' energy and healthy communities. The organization looked at other votes such as judicial confirmations, including that of Nicole Berner in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, which includes North Carolina.

Tiernan Sittenfeld, senior vice president for government affairs at the League of Conservation Voters, said the 117th Congress in 2021 and 2022 was historically productive on environmental issues, including passage of the Inflation Reduction Act. However, the 118th Congress in 2023 and 2024 was among the least productive in recent history.

"Over and over, House Republican leadership catered to the most extreme members of their caucus," she said, "even as 2024 was the hottest year on record for the second year in a row, and communities suffered from climate-fueled deadly and devastating heat waves, wildfires and storms."

Crawford said prospects for legislation on climate change and other issues look grim in the near future, even though building climate-resilient communities would be beneficial in North Carolina.

"Some of these members continue to have their heads stuck in the sand and choose to ignore the problem instead of doing something about it," he said. "It's penny-wise and pound-foolish to have to come in and keep rebuilding some of these areas that are being affected by climate."

A major player in the Northwest's energy landscape is considering changes in the future, as extreme climate events make power delivery in Oregon more unpredictable.

Like utilities in the region, the Bonneville Power Administration - a nonprofit federal administration - is considering joining a larger energy market to ensure reliable access for customers.

BPA is favoring a market known as Markets+, which it says will be less expensive in the long run but could cost between $79 million and $129 million more for ratepayers in 2026.

However, organizations like Save Our Wild Salmon favor the Day-Ahead Energy Market, or EDAM.

Tanya Riordan, policy and advocacy director with the organization, said BPA needs to consider tribal rights in the region, especially when it comes to salmon.

"We can have a more open governance model," said Riordan, "that gives state officials and consumers an equal role, which would keep salmon recovery priorities at the forefront, which is what the EDAM market would offer."

Riordan said the transition to a larger energy market would reduce pressure on the federal hydropower system, also reducing pressure on the region's rivers and salmon.

A formal document outlining BPA's decision is expected in May.

Ben Otto, an energy consultant with the Northwest Energy Coalition, said he also favors EDAM.

He said the BPA has a unique role in the Northwest, with obligations to its customers, but also to the rest of the region by selling hydropower to keep bills low and running a transmission grid in the Northwest.

"Also by mitigating the impacts to salmon and wildlife and tribal interests," said Otto, "this is really important - and we really think that those obligations need to play a more significant role in Bonneville's decision, and we look forward to that being reflected in their record."

Otto said EDAM would reduce costs and be just as reliable as Markets+, and would make the integration of clean energy easier.

He noted that BPA wouldn't fully join the market, regardless of its choice, until 2028 - and so he's urging the administration to take its time making a decision.

"We believe a market that gives a strong role for public interest and state policy is a better fit for Bonneville's obligations than Markets+," said Otto, "which is really more of like a business league and more commercially focused."




get more stories like this via email

A major player in the Northwest's energy landscape is considering changes in the future as extreme climate events make power delivery in Washington more unpredictable.

Like utilities in the region, the Bonneville Power Administration, a nonprofit federal administration, is considering joining a larger energy market to ensure reliable access for customers. BPA is favoring a market known as Markets+, which it said will be less expensive in the long run but could cost between $79 million and $129 million more for ratepayers in 2026.

Organizations like Save Our Wild Salmon favor what is called the Day-Ahead Energy Market, or EDAM.

Tanya Riordan, policy and advocacy director for the group Save Our Wild Salmon, said BPA needs to consider tribal rights in the region, especially when it comes to salmon.

"We can have a more open governance model that gives state officials, consumers an equal role," Riordan suggested. "Which would keep salmon recovery priorities at the forefront, which is what the EDAM market would offer."

Riordan pointed out the transition to a larger energy market would reduce pressure on the federal hydropower system, also reducing pressure on the region's rivers and salmon. A formal document outlining BPA's decision is expected in May.

Ben Otto, energy consultant for the Northwest Energy Coalition, also favors EDAM. He said the BPA has a unique role in the Northwest with obligations to its customers but also to the rest of the region by selling hydropower to keep bills low and running a transmission grid in the Northwest.

"By mitigating the impacts to salmon and wildlife and tribal interests, this is really important and we really think that those obligations need to play a more significant role in Bonneville's decision," Otto explained. "We look forward to that being reflected in their record."

Otto noted EDAM would reduce costs and be just as reliable as Markets+ and would make the integration of clean energy easier. He emphasized BPA would not fully join the market, regardless of its choice, until 2028 and so he is urging the administration to take its time making a decision.

"We believe a market that gives a strong role for public interest and state policy is a better fit for Bonneville's obligations than Markets+, which is really more of like a business league and more commercially focused," Otto added.


get more stories like this via email

The U.S. military and a nonprofit environmental group are seeing success in a partnership that strengthens military readiness and conserves Indiana's natural resources.

Some military installations have compatible land uses around them, such as farms and forests, wetlands and grasslands. Sentinel Landscape, a federal initiative managed in part by the Department of Defense, works with nonprofits to manage those lands.

Emy Brawley, Midwest Region vice president at the Conservation Fund, said southern Indiana received a Sentinel Landscape designation in 2022, allowing her organization to work with bases across the region.

"That designation is supporting four Department of Defense installations, including the Lake Glendora test facility," she said. "All four of those installations provide a wide number of testing and training opportunities for multiple branches of our military."

Brawley said it's important to protect lands around military sites from encroachments that impact the military's ability to maintain mission readiness. She added that commercial developments near military bases can cause noise or light pollution that restricts training and testing drills.

Brawley's organization works in the new Busseron Creek Fish and Wildlife Area, the largest conservation project in Indiana in 20 years. The site serves as a buffer of undeveloped land near the Lake Glendora Test Facility, a military base.

Brawley said the area's natural resources are critical for certain species of wildlife in Indiana.

"This new Fish and Wildlife Area protects a five-mile segment of Busseron Creek, along with forests and wetlands and grasslands and streams and lakes," she said. "In fact, a nearby Fish and Wildlife Area documented over 250 different bird species using it."

Brawley said protecting the land in the new fish and wildlife area will make it more functional as a training and testing site. It also allows for public access and recreational activities such as fishing, hunting and camping.