La resolución presupuestaria aprobada recientemente por la Cámara de Representantes de Estados Unidos exige recortar $2 trillones de dólares en el gasto gubernamental para extender los recortes de impuestos aprobados durante la primera administración de Trump, incluidos $880 billones de dólares del comité que financia la cobertura de Medicaid.

Polly Anderson, vicepresidenta de finanzas y estrategia de Colorado Community Health Network, dice que esos recortes tendrían impactos catastróficos inmediatos para los centros de salud que tratan a todos los pacientes independientemente de su capacidad de pago.

"Actualmente, alrededor del 50% de los pacientes reciben Medicaid, por lo que es el mayor pagador de los centros de salud del estado," explica Anderson. "Por eso es esencial mantener a los proveedores trabajando, mantener el flujo de pacientes a través de los centros de salud y mantener las luces encendidas."

Siete de cada diez votantes de Trump dicen que recortar Medicaid es inaceptable, según una encuesta reciente, y los republicanos señalan que la resolución presupuestaria no incluye la palabra Medicaid ni una sola vez. Según un grupo de vigilancia no partidista, sería prácticamente imposible que el Comité de Energía y Comercio cumpliera su objetivo de $880 billones sin recortar Medicaid o Medicare.

Extender los recortes de impuestos aprobados en 2017 pondría dos tercios de los beneficios en los bolsillos del 20% de los más ricos en Estados Unidos, según el Instituto de Política Fiscal y Económica.

Los recortes a Medicaid también podrían venir en forma de requisitos de trabajo, lo que, según Anderson, puede parecer una buena manera de garantizar que el programa atienda a las personas necesitadas.

"Pero es importante saber que se calcula que el 93% de los pacientes de Medicaid que pueden trabajar ya lo hacen," dice Anderson. "Y los requisitos laborales no son más que una forma de complicar el acceso a las prestaciones. Ya que se quedan atrapados en la burocracia y pierden la cobertura."

El reciente proceso de desmantelamiento de Medicaid, en el que incluso los habitantes de Colorado que cumplían los requisitos para el programa perdieron su seguro médico, presenta un panorama desolador de cómo se verían los amplios recortes a Medicaid.

Anderson dice que los centros de salud siguen brindando atención, pero no reciben reembolsos por esos costos.

"Unas 39,000 personas perdieron su cobertura de Medicaid y hoy siguen sin tener seguro. ¿Y los costos asociados con el cuidado de esas 39,000 personas? Son unos 55 millones de dólares," concluye Anderson.

Ohioans are seeing changes in their water infrastructure as cities work to replace lead service lines, a requirement under federal regulations.

But concerns have risen over the materials being used for replacements.

Teresa McGrath, chief research officer with the group Habitable, said while lead exposure poses significant health risks, she cautions against replacing these pipes with polyvinyl chloride due to its environmental and health implications.

"It's important to get those lead pipes out. Let's prioritize that," said McGrath. "But let's not make a regrettable substitution while we do that."

PVC production involves hazardous chemicals, including vinyl chloride, a known human carcinogen. However, PVC remains a popular choice because of its lower cost and ease of installation.

Environmental health advocate Yvette Jordan - the chair emeritus of the Newark Education Workers Caucus, and a steering committee member at Lead Free NJ - underscores the importance for Ohioans to be well informed about their environments.

"What is in their home?" said Jordan. "If they have a service line, is it plastic? Copper? What exactly is it and how does that affect their health, their community, and most importantly their families and children who are most affected by this?"

McGrath highlighted specific concerns about PVC and alternative materials that could be safer.

"The best available water pipe that we have evaluated for use inside a home is copper pipes," said McGrath, "and we will be the first ones to tell you that copper pipes are not perfect, but it is the best available."




get more stories like this via email

March is National Nutrition Month and rising grocery costs, and food recalls have consumers revisiting the idea of growing their own healthier and more affordable food. Research from gardening site, Gardenp.com shows the average garden produces $600 worth of produce. Indiana farmer's markets attract large numbers of Hoosiers who want fresh, farm-grown fruits, vegetables, and other staples at reasonable prices.

Philip Hartman, president of InstaFarm, which creates countertop food gardens, said foods grown in the healthiest chemical-free soil will produce optimum crops.

"So your food that you buy at the grocery store, your produce, has typically lost up to around 50% of its nutritional value by the time it gets to the store. Also, you don't know how it was grown. So the quality of your produce is linked to the quality of your soil," he said.

Lower costs, convenience, and fewer pesticides make garden-to-table food even more appealing. Hartman advises beginner gardeners to use healthy, nutrient-rich soil because it improves the nutritional value of fruits and vegetables. Gardens use a large amount of soil nutrients and when soil is depleted of these necessary nutrients, the crops are affected too.

Hartman works with students from kindergarten through high school and is passionate about helping children understand where their food comes from. He notes children don't get to see a farm or where their food is grown until they are well into their late teens.

"It's amazing, you know, children that don't usually like vegetables, when they engage in the growing process, all of a sudden, they're inspired to eat this and it's a great way to train them about what's good for them and how to recognize healthy foods," he added.

Gardenpals.com says millennials make up 29% of gardener demographics. Indiana is home to over 60,000 farms covering over 19 million acres. The state ranks in the top five for growing corn, soybeans, blueberries, tomatoes and melons, according to the Indiana Department of Agriculture.

A Minnesota Senate committee today will hear testimony about a rare but scary scenario for families: sudden cardiac events in school settings.

A bill calls for staff training requirements for responding to emergencies. The American Heart Association says each year, more than 23,000 children experience cardiac arrest outside a hospital and 40% are sports-related.

The proposal would require a school district or charter school to develop a Cardiac Emergency Response Plan, so staff know what to do in those critical moments.

Kelly Youland, a Woodbury mother, experienced it firsthand when her baby became unresponsive leaving a Chicago baseball stadium.

"Ultimately, she required CPR for 16 minutes before her pulse came back," Youland recalled.

She and her husband both work in the medical field and had the instincts to help get lifesaving efforts underway. Thankfully, her daughter recovered, inspiring Youland to speak in support of the bill. It includes $2 million to help schools develop plans and secure automated external defibrillators. The Minnesota State High School League testified existing protocols and partnerships already cover this need.

The League did express a desire to work with lawmakers on this measure, citing the need for flexibility amid resource constraints. Youland acknowledged she and her family were lucky but other emergency responses have been slow to come together. She feels such situations can be avoided.

"Our schools prepare for all sorts of emergencies, whether they're fire, weather, lockdown," Youland pointed out. "This is something that our schools need to prepare for."

A bill adopted by the Minnesota Legislature last year called on the Education Department to provide a blueprint for the plans but they remain optional. Last month, a Maple Grove High School track athlete died after going into cardiac arrest following a non-team practice near the school.