COLUMBUS, Ohio - Whether it's urban or rural, where dentists decide to set up shop makes a difference in access to oral health care in Ohio.

New figures from the Ohio Department of Health show the number of so-called "dental shortage areas" in the state increased last year by 10 areas, for a total of 71. Janis Sunderhaus, chief executive officer of Health Partners of Western Ohio, says residents of rural communities particularly lack options for dental care.

"Typically what happens is, people with good insurance can get seen, and people without insurance or insurance that doesn't pay as well don't get seen. That impacts the poor of the community; sometimes, the people that may need it most."

More than 1 million Ohioans live in a designated Dental Health Professional Shortage Area, and the state estimates 880,000 of them are not getting adequate care. Expanding the dental team is one key to changing that, Sunderhaus says, by using registered dental health practitioners. They can provide routine care, fill cavities and perform some extractions.

Mid-level dental practitioners could help all Ohioans get the care they need, she says. That would allow dentists to see more patients with greater needs, she adds, while the dental practitioners handle the routine care in places where there aren't enough dentists.

"By making sure that we're maximizing all types of providers, it makes it more cost-effective and cheaper to deliver care when people need it - not when they've got a huge abscess and we have to go in and do multiple, expensive treatments."

This is an important issue to address, Sunderhaus says, because poor oral health is linked to other serious ailments including heart disease and diabetes.

"We need to look at dental as a key component to any health-care reforms that we do. Without including dental services in that conversation, we will never have really good health for our community."

Some argue that mid-level dental practitioners lack the training needed in case a routine dental procedure would escalate to a more serious issue. But supporters of the idea say a number of states already have licensed them, with no significant problems.


get more stories like this via email

October is Breast Cancer Awareness Month and health professionals are urging women to get screened at earlier ages than previously suggested.

After skin cancer, breast cancer is the most diagnosed form of cancer for women in the U.S.

Dr. Anne Gayman, a family medicine physician at Kaiser Permanente in Seattle, said there has been an increase in breast cancer rates in women in the 40- to 50-year age range. She noted previous recommendations called for women to speak with their health care provider after age 40 about when to start screening.

"These new recommendations from the United States Preventative Services Task Force state that all women should begin screening now at age 40, and repeat screening every other year through age 74," Gayman explained.

About one in eight women will develop breast cancer in their lifetime, according to the American Cancer Society, which also said breast cancer rates in Washington state are higher than the national average and screening rates are lower. The state has the ninth-highest cancer rate in the country, and the 10th-lowest screening rate.

Gayman said it is unclear what is driving up the numbers for younger women.

"We don't know, but we know that younger women can get often quite aggressive forms of cancer," Gayman pointed out. "These new recommendations help us to get more young women having regular screenings, which can help to intervene earlier."

Gayman emphasized there are new treatments to target breast cancer and more research is being done because some forms are still hard to treat and acknowledged some big improvements in breast cancer survival rates.

"A lot of that is thought to be due to the increased rates of screening, because the earlier we catch breast cancer the more treatable it is, right?" Gayman added. "If we can catch it before it's moved outside of the breast, your prognosis is much better."

A community health center in East Tennessee is offering essential medical services on wheels, to families cleaning up after Hurricane Helene.

Cherokee Health Systems in Knoxville has sent out its mobile clinic, equipped with exam rooms, a lab and telemedicine capabilities.

Dr. Parinda Khatri, CEO of Cherokee Health Systems, said it has been stationed at places like community parks, gas stations and church parking lots, to provide comprehensive first aid and health care, along with mental health support.

"This week, we are focused on the community center, and we're offering medical care, behavioral health via telemedicine," Khatri outlined. "Because people are experiencing quite a bit of trauma. So, we are giving hepatitis A vaccinations, because of the risk with the contaminated water, and also tetanus shots."

Gov. Bill Lee recently announced a $100 million Helene Emergency Assistance Loans Program to help Tennesseans in counties affected by the hurricane. HEAL funds will be used to repair water and wastewater systems and remove dangerous debris.

Khatri emphasized her pharmacy's involvement is crucial due to people's ongoing needs for medications. The mobile medical clinic is also addressing basic care needs, distributing items like baby formula, diapers and blankets. She added the mobile clinic prioritizes providing care regardless of cost and has not turned anyone away due to financial reasons.

"We have been giving out water, a tremendous amount of water," Khatri observed. "We've been giving out personal hygiene kits, emergency medical kits, wound care supplies, because people have come in with injuries. We are giving all of those resources that, you know, the medical supplies that they need."

She noted the community has never experienced such widespread destruction and it is unclear how long the recovery will take. The psychological effects of the disaster are significant, as people recount being rescued from their homes and losing contact with loved ones. The trauma of rebuilding and the financial, emotional and physical strains will likely have lasting impacts.


get more stories like this via email

Following Hurricane Helene, Hurricane Milton left a trail of destruction across the Sunshine State and the combination has pushed some Community Health Centers to their limits.

While some were spared from structural damage, other clinics were not so fortunate. The Florida Association of Community Health Centers represents 54 health centers across the state that see patients regardless of their ability to pay.

Jonathan Chapman, CEO of the association, said more than 30 service locations have been significantly damaged by the storms, which has prompted deep concerns about the health center network.

"I talked to a health center just a few minutes ago," Chapman recounted. "They just went on one of their sites this morning, only to find out that all the windows were smashed in from the storm; the rain, the wind caused damage."

He noted closing the six centers in the immediate Tampa area would mean at least $1.6 million a day in lost revenue. While national disaster agencies are offering assistance with mobile units and temporary locations, Chapman emphasized the available funding falls short of covering operational costs, especially as many centers had already depleted their reserves from Hurricane Helene.

Chapman added he has been frustrated with the federal response, particularly the lack of immediate financial relief for operational costs. However, he pointed out the clinics are doing their best to remain fully operational where possible, using whatever resources they can get.

"We're looking at smaller grants, maybe $10,000 or $15,000, from here and there," Chapman explained. "If we're looking at $1.5 million to $2 million a day, as good as that sounds, that's barely scratching the surface."

Chapman added in some cases, federal funding, including FEMA aid, will not be accessible for months. In Congress, House Speaker Mike Johnson faces pressure to reconvene lawmakers to pass more FEMA funding for recovery, but Johnson insists funding is not the issue, pointing to the $20 billion Congress previously allocated to FEMA.