PHOENIX – Efforts by the oil and gas industry to roll back an Obama-era environmental rule don't sit well with most Arizonans, according to a new poll.

The energy industry wants Congress to kill a rule which reduces the amount of natural gas released or burned off at drilling sites on public land.

Lost royalties cost the federal, state and tribal governments millions of dollars annually. The Interior Department says enough natural gas was lost between 2009 and 2015 to serve more than 6 million homes for a year.

David Jenkins, president of the advocacy group Conservatives for Responsible Stewardship, says the idea of saving taxpayers money has bipartisan appeal.

"These assets that the BLM manages, of natural gas, if it's flared and not responsibly collected, you know, we don't get royalties on that," he explained. "So taxpayer assets are just being wasted and put up into the air."

The poll by Colorado College shows that four out of five Arizonans support the rule. Another survey by Adrian Gray Consulting finds that seven out of ten people nationwide are behind it too, with nearly equal support from Republicans, Democrats and Independents.

Oil and gas companies say the rule is expensive and unnecessary. They scored their first victory three weeks ago when the House voted to kill it. The issue nows goes to the Senate where Jenkins and others are looking to Arizona Senators John McCain and Jeff Flake for support.

"They've told us they're still looking at it," he said. "They haven't committed one way or the other. We're holding out hope for them as well."

This is the second rollback of an Obama environmental rule by the Republican-led Congress. Earlier this month, they scrapped a rule that limited how much mining waste could be dumped into small waterways. GOP leaders promise that more rollbacks are coming, as they follow President Donald Trump's lead to reduce government regulations.


get more stories like this via email

In the future, clean energy projects in Minnesota might come together more quickly, since state lawmakers have advanced a permitting reform measure.

The policy effort gained steam throughout the legislative session, with final negotiations playing out late last week.

Researchers say Minnesota's current permitting process for solar projects used to take an average of 300 days - now it's nearly 550.

There's also pressure to get additional transmission lines up and running so there's more space on the power grid for renewables.

Clean Grid Alliance Regional Policy Director Peder Mewis said he feels the new provisions will be a big help.

"Basically what the bill does is, it completely rewrites the siting and permitting statutes in Minnesota and combines them all into one," said Mewis, "so it's a lot easier to track things."

Mewis described the state's current process as strong, but cumbersome.

For skeptics worried about removing opportunities for the public to scrutinize these projects, supporters insist that won't be an issue.

The bipartisan bill arose from a recent task force report that included input from utilities, developers, environmental groups and property rights advocates.

Just like some other Midwestern states, Minnesota has adopted ambitious goals to reduce carbon emissions.

Mewis said there's increasing awareness that regulatory hurdles need to be dealt with as climate plans are mapped out.

"If you look at what we did in Michigan last year, where we enacted a carbon-free standard," said Mewis, "and with that, we did siting and permitting reform because the state recognized that's a key component."

Last year, Minnesota established a standard of 100% carbon-free electricity by 2040.

As for the permitting reform plan, Gov. Tim Walz expressed support for the idea going into the session. He's expected to sign the bill sent to his desk.




get more stories like this via email

Missouri homes and businesses have installed enough solar energy to power 68,000 homes each year.

A new report released by the Solar Energy Industries Association showed more than half of all solar installations in the United States have come online since 2020, with more than 25% installed since the Inflation Reduction Act passed almost two years ago.

Abigail Ross Hopper, president and CEO of the association, noted for Missouri farmers and rural residents, the most significant expense is power, needed for pumps, heating grow houses and running equipment.

"They're not paying for the sunshine," Ross Hopper pointed out. "And so, when they install solar to run their pump, or when they install solar on top of a chicken house, it saves an incredible amount of money because they are now using the sun to energize their system."

The report noted in 2012, only California had more than 25,000 solar systems installed. Today, 23 states and territories can make that claim, and 11 have surpassed 100,000 solar installations. More than 38,000 are in Missouri, which ranks 34th in the nation.

Ross Hopper emphasized not only is the growth in solar energy happening quickly, but it is sustained and she predicts it will continue to be.

"It took 40 years for the United States to install a million solar projects, and then it only took eight years to get to 5 million, and that is indicative of the rapid growth," Ross Hopper stressed. "We think it'll only take six years to get to 10 million."

She added the solar industry supports the careers of about 2,900 Missourians and has invested $1.6 billion in the state's economy.


get more stories like this via email

A new rule from the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission could improve Virginia's electric grid transmission capacity.

It requires utilities and grid operators to plan 20 years ahead to accommodate expected changes in energy production. The rule is designed to help Virginia meet the high energy demands of the growing data center market and prevent service disruptions in extreme weather.

Nick Guidi, senior attorney for the Southern Environmental Law Center, said the rule will help the state reach its climate goals.

"For the first time in a lot of these states, the transmission planning process will have to explicitly take into account state goals and corporate clean energy goals," Guidi explained. "That hasn't really happened before."

He added the current process holds back state activity. The rule faced sharp criticism from FERC Commissioner Mark Christie. He characterizes it as a way to enact policies never passed by Congress and calls it "a blatant violation of the major questions doctrine." Guidi thinks it could lead to legal challenges.

Another new rule makes transmission siting easier.

Jon Gordon, policy director for the group Advanced Energy United, feels the FERC orders create advancements in transmission infrastructure development, calling it an arduous but necessary process to improve transmission capacity.

"I think as a country we've sort of gotten behind the 8-ball on upgrading our transmission infrastructure," Gordon asserted. "Now we've reached a point where we need to move quickly on transmission upgrades to ensure reliability."

He added more comprehensive long-term transmission planning is needed to ensure the lowest-cost transmission is built for reliability.

Virginia passed legislation making transmission easier. It comes as the state's grid operator, PJM Interconnection, which ranked poorly in a report due to a backlog of interconnection projects. The law means an additional 40% capacity for the current grid and saves the state congestion costs.


get more stories like this via email