SEATTLE - For the third year in a row, the Trump administration has proposed eliminating funding for after-school and summer-learning programs.
President Donald Trump's proposed 2020 budget cuts funding for the 21st Century Community Learning Centers program by $1.2 billion. In the past, Trump administration officials have questioned the effectiveness of expanded learning opportunities.
But Racie McKee, 21st Century After-school project director with the Omak School District in north-central Washington, said these grant funds are critical for small, rural areas such as hers.
She said in the application for a 21st Century grant, the local high school's assistant principal highlighted the program's importance.
"She wrote a letter of support, and she listed 30 kids from the high school that she knew if they had not engaged and became part of our after-school program, that they would not have finished high school," McKee said. "So I think that's a huge success right there."
In past years, Congress has rejected Trump's calls to eliminate the program, keeping funding at the same level and even increasing it in 2018.
According to the Afterschool Alliance, 21st Century program grants serve nearly 18,000 kids in the Evergreen State. The state would lose nearly $18 million in budget allocations if the program is cut.
Twenty-first Century Learning Center funding largely serves kids in high-poverty areas from working families. Elizabeth Chick, who oversees expanded learning programs for the Puget Sound Education Service District, said after-school and summer learning are especially important in districts that don't have nearby YMCA or United Way programs. She said many families they serve are one paycheck away from becoming homeless.
"We're eliminating one barrier by providing free programs and giving the students equitable opportunities for social-emotional learning and educational support," Chick said.
After-school and summer-learning program advocates also highlight that these programs keep kids safe and out of trouble. Nearly 2 million children nationwide will be affected if 21st Century Community Learning Centers' funding is cut.
get more stories like this via email
The Indiana Chamber of Commerce outlined six key priorities for lawmakers ahead of the legislative session in January.
Rather than releasing detailed policy positions, the Chamber emphasized broad focus areas, including workforce, education, economic growth, infrastructure, quality of place and community health.
Phil GiaQuinta, D-Fort Wayne, House Minority Leader, responded to the Chamber's priorities, highlighting the need to address child care as a factor in economic development.
"We talk about economic development with things that impact economic development here in the state. Child care is really one of those," GiaQuinta contended.
The organization stressed the critical role of affordable child care in workforce development, citing a report estimating Indiana loses $4.2 billion annually, including $1.7 billion in tax revenue due to child care challenges. High costs force some parents out of the workforce, straining the state's economy.
Statehouse leaders acknowledged the issue but differ on solutions. Democrats argued child care deserves more state investment, while Republican leaders believe the private sector should play a larger role.
Todd Huston, R-Fishers, Speaker of the House, said businesses should not expect the state to solve their child care problems entirely.
"They've done a lot of different things to try to support families and young families. We will continue to do that," Huston stated. "But I think we also have to set a level of expectations that we're not going to; the state's not going to be funding all universal pre-K."
The Chamber plans to release detailed policy proposals in January, aiming to guide lawmakers toward strategies to strengthen Indiana's economy and workforce.
get more stories like this via email
North Dakota is no stranger to public pension debates. States face pressure to keep retirement systems well-funded and new data show most Americans place great value on such benefits for both government and private-sector workers.
According to the National Institute on Retirement Security, 86% of Americans believe all workers, not just those employed by state and local governments, should have a pension. There are similar approval levels when asked how important public pensions are in recruiting teachers and public safety workers.
Dan Doonan, executive director of the institute, suggested it is not too surprising to see the results.
"Pensions, along with other benefits, are part of creating that culture of careers and not jobs," Doonan explained.
Starting in January, North Dakota will close its main public pension plan for new hires, who will instead be offered a 401(k)-style benefit. The move followed debate over whether it was the right way to address a $1.9 billion unfunded liability. Backers argued it protects benefits for existing workers and taxpayers but skeptics contended it makes it harder to attract workers to the public sector.
Doonan noted the survey results overlap with the idea maintaining an experienced public-sector workforce is a good thing for community members and not just the employee and employer.
"In general, when public services are done well, they're often invisible, right?" Doonan emphasized. "We want good roads, we want safe communities, and I think Americans understand the role of having career public servants in terms of delivering those outcomes."
The Bureau of Labor Statistics said state and local governments employ about 20 million workers, which represents about 13% of the U.S. workforce.
Disclosure: The National Public Pension Coalition contributes to our fund for reporting on Budget Policy and Priorities, Livable Wages/Working Families, and Social Justice. If you would like to help support news in the public interest,
click here.
get more stories like this via email
As Nebraskans anticipate the upcoming holiday season, some might also be looking ahead to the 2025 tax season, which will include a new tax credit for family caregivers, including those looking after military veterans.
Starting in 2025, a new state law provides eligible family caregivers up to $2,000 in tax credits for out-of-pocket expenses. The cap increases to $3,000 if the family member receiving care has dementia or is a veteran.
Jina Ragland, associate state director of advocacy and outreach for AARP Nebraska, said those who served have access to care benefits through the Department of Veterans Affairs but added it sometimes is not enough.
"Because some of their service-related illnesses or injuries, they extend beyond what they're able to afford, or maybe what the coverage is through the VA," Ragland explained.
She pointed out it puts more pressure on loved ones assisting them on a daily basis. During National Veterans and Military Families Month, supporters of the new law hope more families will see if they are eligible. Ragland noted while it helps reduce the financial strain, greater awareness of resources is also needed, to help all family caregivers avoid burnout.
Ragland emphasized one example is providing caregivers information about where to turn for guidance when a loved one is first discharged from a hospital. She argued entities at all levels need to maintain progress, because their outreach shows a demand for solutions.
"Over 90% of Nebraskans say that they want to age in place with the lowest level of care," Ragland reported. "In order to do that, oftentimes we have to rely on family caregivers."
There are no age restrictions to qualify for the tax credit. As for eligibility factors, the law includes an income limit of $50,000 dollars for individuals and $100,000 for married couples.
Disclosure: AARP Nebraska contributes to our fund for reporting on Budget Policy and Priorities, Consumer Issues, Health Issues, and Senior Issues. If you would like to help support news in the public interest,
click here.
get more stories like this via email