GLENDIVE, Mont. – The latest proposed rules for disposing of radioactive oil waste in Montana have some residents concerned.

The state Department of Environmental Quality wants to raise the radioactive limit from 50 picocuries per gram to 200.

The state already has licensed four landfills to accept the radioactive byproduct of oil drilling.

Oaks Disposal near the eastern town of Glendive has been accepting radioactive waste since 2013 and nearby residents have urged DEQ to come up with regulations for the waste. The agency's first rule draft came in 2017.

Maggie Copeland is a Glendive resident and member of Northern Plains Resource Council, a grassroots conservation and family agriculture group.

"Now we get these new rules and I'm just shocked,” she states. “I honestly am just shocked that they want 200 picocuries when 50 has been the limit all along. It just feels like we're at the race to the bottom of a waste dump here."

Copeland says the new proposal could attract more waste from North Dakota's oilfields. The limit in that state is 50 picocuries per gram.

And Copeland worries other surrounding states with lower limits could use Montana as a dumping ground as well.

She says the worst case scenario is that landowners in and near Glendive lose their water. She says waste trucks drive by a crucial source of water for the community, Deer Creek, and one accident could do them in.

"We're always going to have this industry waste,” Copeland states. “There's going to be tons and tons and tons of it. But we can't create water and we can't create soil. I mean, once it's fouled, it's game over."

The other three licensed disposal sites, which haven't started accepting radioactive waste yet, are in Culbertson, Missoula and Plentywood.

DEQ is accepting public comment through Oct. 21 and holding meetings on the proposal in Glendive on Sept. 24 and Helena on Oct. 10.

A new report questions the feasibility of power plants transitioning to hydrogen gas to run their turbines.

Despite claims that hydrogen is a "clean energy" solution for reducing carbon emissions in North Carolina, the research details significant challenges and uncertainties.

Report author Dennis Wamsted, an energy analyst for the Institute for Energy Economics and Financial Analysis, said they found that hydrogen isn't a readily available option, because there isn't much infrastructure in terms of pipelines or storage, as well as a lack of supply.

"So, you have these three different parts of the infrastructure that would take an incredible amount of time to build," he said, "and would cost an incredible amount of money to construct."

He said energy companies would have to continue to use methane gas until they could make the transition.

In North Carolina, Duke Energy is among the companies proposing a hydrogen-capable gas plant in Person County. The proposal has faced pushback from environmental groups, who have said the move could expose customers to large financial risks and fossil fuel pollution.

Wamsted said hydrogen use also has environmental concerns because of the marginal benefits it provides in cutting emissions.

"So, if you were to substitute hydrogen into a gas turbine, and you say, you started out at 5% of hydrogen and 95% traditional methane gas," he said. "you essentially get no environmental benefit from that, because you get very little CO2 reduction."

Wamsted also warned that hydrogen-related power projects not only come with a high price tag, but may also burden ratepayers without a guarantee of success. He said this could get in the way of cheaper and more prevalent renewable energy alternatives - such as wind, solar and battery storage.

"We have the alternatives now, that we know the cost of and that are available," he said, "that we can use in the next five years or 10 years to build out as much green energy, renewable energy, as we possibly can."

The report calls on utilities to be more transparent with their data and asks state regulators to consider the true impact hydrogen would have, long-term.

Ohio lawmakers are asking Congress to address longstanding safety failures of class-one freight railroads, to prevent disasters like last year's massive train derailment in East Palestine.

House Resolution 8996 would require that rail companies employ a second crewman and implement a confidential reporting system, among other reforms.

At a recent hearing, U.S. Ohio Rep. Michael Rulli - R-Youngstown - said the East Palestine derailment has caused irreparable environmental and economic damage.

He said the legislation would require companies like Norfolk Southern to ensure hazmat expertise on board is shared with on-scene responders - which one of the chemical companies, Oxy Vinyl LP, did not do.

"Oxy Vinyl manufactured the chemicals on board the train in East Palestine," said Rulli. "They recommended not to vent and burn the contents of the train, but this recommendation wasn't shared with first responders until after the fact."

After the Norfolk Southern train derailed and exploded, known carcinogens - including vinyl chloride - were released into the air, soil and water.

East Palestine residents immediately reported experiencing nosebleeds, rashes, throat and eye irritation, vomiting, and difficulty breathing.

Many report lingering health problems, more than a year after the accident.

Federal Railroad Administration Administrator Amit Bose said the agency has been supportive of the legislation, in addition to conducting inspections on high-hazard, flammable train routes.

"For over a year, the Department of Transportation has continued those calls," said Bose, "while concurrently taking important actions to make freight rail safer."

According to Federal data, there were 952 class-one train derailments in 2022, with about 77% occurring in railyards and 23% on mainline tracks.




get more stories like this via email

Only one in five Arizona voters said they have heard about President Joe Biden's effort to address climate change and expand clean energy.

One organization contends Arizona seniors have won big with the passage of the Inflation Reduction Act as well as the Bipartisan Infrastructure Law, especially as the state continues to battle relentless heat and the effects of climate change.

Dora Vazques, executive director of the Arizona Alliance for Retired Americans, said older Arizonans experience greater risk when exposed to extreme temperatures, which has led to an increased demand for energy and price hikes.

"It is a crisis in that 'are we able to pay for those electricity bills?'" Vazques noted. "With this plan, there are a lot of incentives to weatherize your home. Weatherize meaning that you can have funding to put in new windows, to put in insulation; things that will help to protect you."

The Arizona Governor's Office of Resiliency is expected to take advantage of about $150 million in rebates to benefit Arizona homes.

Vazques pointed out older adults, who rely on Social Security to cover their expenses, are less likely to combat rising energy costs and are less able to afford repairs on dated equipment. Information on incentives is at homes.rewiringamerica.org.

While upfront costs for going electric tend to be higher than fossil-fuel dependent counterparts, Vazques noted the investments will save money in the long-term. He emphasized one of the biggest challenges is the lack of awareness among Arizona homeowners and renters about the help available to them.

"They need those upgrades to move away from gas appliances to electric appliances, to upgrade that cooler to an air conditioner," Vazques outlined. "This is a godsend for all of Arizona."

Vazques added clean energy investments will also help Arizona's economy. Biden's clean energy plan will bring more than $4 billion in clean energy investments to Arizona by 2030, according to Climate Power.


get more stories like this via email