NEW YORK -- More than four dozen New York millionaires have signed a letter to state lawmakers with a proposal to help the state recover from the economic impact of the pandemic: tax the rich.
The COVID pandemic has cost millions of New Yorkers their jobs and will leave an estimated $63 billion gap in the state budget over the next four years.
In their letter, the millionaires say the state should enact the taxes that are part of the proposed Invest in Our New York Act.
Mike Lapham, director of the Responsible Wealth project at United for a Fair Economy, said raising taxes on high incomes, billionaires, large inheritances, corporations, stock sales and capital gains could close that gap.
"The whole package could be as much as $50 billion a year," Lapham asserted. "It's not likely that they'll all get passed, but there's a lot of money there that could help the state and that wealthy people can afford to pay."
Some lawmakers claim if taxes are raised on the rich, they would move to a state with lower taxes, but Responsible Wealth said studies have shown that's not true.
Lapham pointed out since New York increased taxes on the rich in 2009, the number of millionaires who call the state home has actually risen by more than 60%.
"The reality is if you have a business, if you have a whole community, if you have been living in this state for years, you're not going to just up and move to some other state because your taxes go up by a few thousand dollars a year," Lapham contended.
In their letter to lawmakers, the millionaires said in fact they are the least likely to move because their taxes go up.
Lapham noted a one-time infusion of federal cash can't fix the state's long-term economic problems, but the wealthiest state residents have a vested interest in raising the standard of living for all New Yorkers.
"They are profoundly interested in having a healthy state to live in and having the state invest in things like public education, transportation and infrastructure," Lapham observed.
He added taxing those who can afford to pay will not only fill the budget gap, but reverse decades of growing economic inequality and make New York a state that works for everyone.
get more stories like this via email
Washington lawmakers and Gov. Robert Ferguson disagree about how to address the state's $16 billion revenue shortfall.
The House and Senate have both passed budgets which would tax wealthy residents and corporations in order to balance the budget.
In contrast, Ferguson's plan cuts social programs and furloughs employees to save the state $7 billion.
Jeffrey Gustaveson is an organizer with Firelands Workers United, an advocacy group for rural Washingtonians. He said he supports lawmaker's efforts to make the tax system more fair.
"They're saying we should support working people," said Gustaveson, "and we're going to unlock new sources of money by increasing taxes on giant corporations, and some of the wealthiest human beings in the face of the planet."
As budget negotiations move forward, Ferguson called relying on untested taxes irresponsible. Lawmakers have until April 27 to finalize a budget acceptable to the Governor.
David Henson, a retired veteran and volunteer for Firelands, highlighted what's known as the Tax on Wall Street, which would apply to people who own stocks and bonds worth over $50 million.
Democrats say it would generate about $4 billion a year for the state.
"But it only affects 4,300 people in the state of Washington," said Henson. "They only pay 4% -- where we're paying, on average, 14% of our income on taxes. I don't think it's robbery."
Ferguson says his budget does not include reductions to vital services. But, Gustaveson countered, the governor's definition of vital is narrow.
He said a 6% cut from all state agencies will harm many services Washington residents rely on including healthcare, housing, and transit.
"There's a very clear message, I think, from the public right now," said Gustaveson, "that they support public programs and they support funding those public programs with fair taxes."
Democratic lawmakers say their proposed taxes would generate $17 billion over two years, bringing the state out of the red.
Disclosure: Firelands Workers Building Community Power contributes to our fund for reporting on Housing/Homelessness, Public Lands/Wilderness. If you would like to help support news in the public interest,
click here.
get more stories like this via email
As many Minnesotans dig out from an early Spring snowstorm, the future of a federal program that helps low-income households pay their heating bills is less certain. State-level voices cite new spending cuts under the Trump administration. The most recent mass layoffs may include the entire staff that administers the Low-Income Home Energy Assistance Program - according to reports seen by the Citizens Utility Board of Minnesota. The "LIHEAP" funds are sent to state agencies for distribution.
Annie Levenson-Falk, Citizens Utility Board of Minnesota director, worries about payment delays for Minnesotans in need if federal staff isn't there.
"It's pretty concerning to see just the complete elimination of the staff on what is a vital and extremely popular program," she explained.
In an e-mailed statement, the Minnesota Commerce Department says so far this season, the program has helped about 107,000 households cover their utility bills. Amid the staffing upheaval, it anticipates running out of funds to help new applicants as early as mid-April.
The loss of LIHEAP staff comes at a time when energy customers are bracing for potentially higher bills economists link to the escalating trade war pursued by President Donald Trump. Levenson-Falk said her organization is watching to see how this region could be affected as America's trade partners respond to sweeping tariffs.
"It's going to really vary depending on where you live. Some utilities get a lot of electricity from Canada and some get much less, but I do think it could have a substantial effect on a lot of Minnesotans," she continued.
Minnesota officials are not only worried about the effects as the last bit of winter weather hangs on. There is also concern about what will happen this summer to households at risk, between the disruption of energy assistance and tariff-induced price hikes.
Levensen-Falk encouraged people who are eligible for aid to keep applying, and reaching out to service providers with questions.
get more stories like this via email
Backlash is mounting across the U.S. in response to the Trump administration's consistent push to cut federal staffing and programs. North Dakotans not happy with these moves will join another wave of protests this weekend. On Saturday, organizers in towns and cities nationwide will lead what are billed as "Hands Off" events. Demonstrators want to bring renewed focus to the level of cuts pursued by the White House, and the abrupt manner in which they're being carried out.
Lyn Dockter-Pinnick, lead of the grassroots group Red River United Indivisible, feels uneasy about what she calls a "slash and burn" mentality within the administration.
"And so, the concept of "Hands Off" is really not only saying, 'This isn't right, this isn't OK,' but also just concern over the speed and the upheaval that is happening," she said.
She is worried about services for military veterans, such as suicide prevention. The White House says it wants to root out waste and fraud. Dockter-Pinnick says reform is important, but adds that checks and balances are being ignored, citing the influence of wealthy adviser Elon Musk and the Department of Government Efficiency. Regional events this Saturday will be held in Fargo, Grand Forks, Bismarck and Minot.
While North Dakota residents express their frustration, state agencies and nonprofits are adjusting on the fly as cuts are announced. This week, federal officials began laying off ten-thousand Health and Human Services workers.
Seth O'Neill, executive director of the North Dakota Domestic & Sexual Violence Coalition, says that includes staffers who oversee grants his network of crisis centers relies on.
"It's unnerving when you don't know who to call to get answers because you don't know who is still employed at the federal government," he explained.
While the actual prevention grants haven't been cut yet, O'Neill is still worried about their fate. He notes that for these crisis centers, federal funding makes up 30% of their budget. Late last month, North Dakota Health and Human Services officials were left scrambling after being notified that several grants, focusing on substance abuse and mental-health treatment, were terminated early.
get more stories like this via email