Parents and educators in the Houston Independent School District said they are all for improving schools but do not believe a state takeover by an unelected board of managers will boost test scores.
The Texas Education Agency said the takeover of the state's largest school district is necessary because schools have failed to meet state standards.
Jackie Anderson, president of the Houston Federation of Teachers, called it a hostile move opposed by many Houston elected officials, local education advocates and parents. She cited a poll by New Economy for Working Houston showing two-thirds of Harris County voters oppose the takeover.
"These schools are underperforming because for years, the district has not given them what they need," Anderson contended. "We believe that all of this is a way to fund the charter schools, but defund public schools."
In 2015, Texas passed a law allowing the state to take over an entire school district if even one campus is rated "F" in standardized test performance within five years.
This week, the Texas Education Agency named former Dallas schools superintendent Mike Miles to be superintendent in Houston. Miles arrived from leadership posts in Colorado, where he founded a public network of charter schools.
The Houston school district had fought the state takeover since 2019, but a GOP-controlled state Supreme Court cleared the state's legal path in January, despite a "B" grade the district received in the most recent state school ratings.
Audrey Nath, a parent in the Houston Independent School District, said her son just completed Kindergarten and had an exceptional year.
"I am left to surmise that the true intent is part of a larger push for dismantling of public education," Nath asserted. "Because not a single reason that was stated officially made any sense."
There are 276 schools within the Houston school district, with nearly 197,000 students. The district's minority enrollment is 90%, and nearly 60% of students are economically disadvantaged.
get more stories like this via email
A new survey shows there's been an increase in the number of police officers on the streets since the COVID-19 exodus, but some Americans are still behaving badly when they think no one's looking.
A survey by the Police Executive Research Forum shows more sworn officers were hired in 2023 than any of the previous four years, and fewer officers overall resigned or retired.
Lance LoRusso, founder of the Blue Line Lawyer Institute, said bad behavior is still evident in communities where not enough officers were available to patrol parks or other public spaces.
"There is a segment of the population that if they don't believe there's consequences for their actions, they will not act in a lawful manner," LoRusso asserted. "They don't, because there's nobody making sure that they're taking care of their obligations and they're treating each other in a civil manner."
More than 200 law enforcement agencies responded to the survey. It showed that while small and medium departments had more sworn officers than they did in January 2020, large departments are still more than 5% below earlier staffing levels.
In March, New Mexico's Bernalillo County Sheriff's Department announced a crackdown on drivers traveling at excessive speeds, which LoRusso said became a problem during the pandemic coast to coast and has not subsided in some areas. He says citizens should not hesitate to report such incidents.
"People racing cars is dangerous. It's completely anti-social, unlawful, dangerous behavior that shows a complete disrespect for the other people in your community. And yet, it's tolerated," he said.
Car break-ins also increased during the pandemic, which LoRusso said might feel like an isolated incident, but is usually indicative of a larger problem.
get more stories like this via email
Missouri residents are gaining new insights into the powerful role of food in health care as experts and organizations advocate for a shift toward food-as-medicine initiatives.
Kelsey Gardiner, assistant professor of nursing and health studies at the University of Missouri-Kansas City, emphasized the critical link between access to healthy food and improved health outcomes. She noted individuals facing food insecurity often experience higher rates of chronic diseases, highlighting the urgent need for systemic changes to enhance food access.
"There are things we can do and there are certain shifts nationally that are happening, whether that be through policy or through infrastructure changes," Gardiner pointed out. "We can be doing more in the state of Missouri in order to help increase access to healthy food that can directly tie into better health outcomes."
Gardiner underscored the potential of food-as-medicine interventions in preventing chronic conditions and reducing health care costs. She said recent studies show such interventions can lead to $13.6 billion over one year in cost savings and several improved health outcomes, making them a valuable addition to health care strategies.
Kael Martin, people impact strategist for the Health Forward Foundation, said focusing on communities affected by structural racism, socioeconomic challenges and limited health care access is paramount. Food as medicine is seen as a strategic approach to promote health equity, particularly in areas where systemic barriers hinder optimal health.
"We know that eating healthy can prevent chronic disease, but it can be a treatment option as well," Martin stressed. "To have that connection within our health care system, to really integrate these interventions, can be really impactful for many patients."
While progress is underway nationally and in other states such as Massachusetts, California and North Carolina, Missouri is still developing its approach to integrate food as medicine into health care systems and policies. Efforts to push for legislation supporting these initiatives are in progress, with some federal legislation around medically tailored meals garnering support.
Disclosure: The Health Forward Foundation contributes to our fund for reporting on Health Issues, and Housing/Homelessness. If you would like to help support news in the public interest,
click here.
get more stories like this via email
As many Wyomingites await their 2023 federal income tax refunds, a new National Priorities Project report breaks down how the money they won't get back is being spent.
Co-author Lindsay Koshgarian, program director for the National Priorities Project, said this year's Tax Receipt shows that - while many school districts in Wyoming and across the U.S. are facing major budget cuts - the average taxpayer is contributing thousands of dollars to military contractors, including Boeing, Lockheed Martin, and Raytheon.
"So whereas the average Wyoming taxpayer was giving almost $2,300 to corporate pentagon contractors," said Koshgarian, "they were giving only $455 for public education in our K-12 schools."
The average American household paid over $5,000 for militarism and support systems, but invested just $110 in the Child Tax Credit - which cut child poverty in half during pandemic era changes.
The Pentagon has failed to account for money spent in audits for the past six years. But its defenders argue tax dollars create jobs and maintain global security in the face of competitors, including China.
Koshgarian said corporate contractors can create jobs, especially in key Congressional districts.
She pointed to Brown University research showing that $1 billion in military spending adds roughly 11,000 jobs.
By comparison, $1 billion would add nearly 27,000 education, and 17,000 healthcare jobs.
"But if we put that same money into other things like education or infrastructure or healthcare," said Koshgarian, "we could actually create more good jobs with the same amount of money."
The U.S. Department of Defense has known about the existential threat of climate change for decades, and wildfires now cost upward of $394 billion in damages each year.
But the average taxpayer invested just $14 in wildfire management.
Koshgarian said she believes concerns about protecting international security, which largely serve corporate interests, are overblown.
"The U.S. is already the top military spender in the world by far," said Koshgarian. "We spend more than the next 10 militaries combined. We have the most capable military by far in the world, and no one disputes that."
get more stories like this via email