The Illinois Board of Higher Education is among the winners of a national competition to improve the college admissions process and increase people's access to higher education.
The board received a $750,000 award from Lumina Foundation to implement a direct-admissions program for community college transfer students and recent high school graduates.
Ginger Ostro, the board's executive director, said it will streamline procedures and promote inclusivity to ensure all students have equitable opportunities.
"It's really important to emphasize that this is a key strategy towards equity and addressing the needs of historically underserved students," she said, "and really recognizing the importance of higher education in social and economic mobility."
Ostro said the direct admissions program will proactively inform eligible students that they have been accepted at a particular institution - without the student having to submit an application.
The foundation's Great Admissions Redesign competition awarded grants to seven educational institutions across the country. After reviewing more than 70 applications and using criteria to ensure fair and just outcomes for underserved students, Lumina awarded more than $3 million in implementation and planning grants.
Ostro said the Illinois program's primary goal is to change the way college admissions are conducted.
"Direct admissions would allow us to use data that we already have at the state level to identify students who are already qualified for admission at our various public universities," she said.
Melanie Heath, strategy director at Lumina, called the program "innovative and unique," and said it should simplify the admissions process so more Illinoisans have an opportunity for higher education.
"If a system is incredibly complicated," she said, "then those that have the time and resources and support can navigate it, and those that don't are disproportionately burdened with that process."
Support for this reporting was provided by Lumina Foundation.
get more stories like this via email
By Jon Marcus for The Hechinger Report.
Broadcast version by Zamone Perez for Maryland News Connection reporting for The Hechinger Report-Public News Service Collaboration
Nathan Smith has already sent three kids to college. But he's never seen anything like the volume of recruiting materials pouring in since his fourth child reached her senior year in high school this fall.
"If you put the other three together and multiplied it by four, that's how much mail she's gotten," said Smith, who takes a professional interest in this as chair of the Northern Kentucky University Board of Regents.
"What I see is that they're fishing," he said of the institutions that are appealing to his daughter to apply. "They can't catch the fish they want with just one pole. They've got to put in 10 poles. I think they're casting the net further and wider."
As enrollment in colleges and universities continues to decline - down by more than 2 million students, or 10 percent, in the 10 years ending 2022 - they're not only casting wider nets. Something else dramatic is happening to the college application process, for the first time in decades:
It's becoming easier to get in.
Colleges and universities, on average, are admitting a larger proportion of their applicants than they did 20 years ago, new research by the conservative think tank the American Enterprise Institute finds.
The median acceptance rate at bachelor's degree-granting universities and colleges was 7.6 percentage points higher in 2022 than it was in 2012, AEI found. Those are the most recent available admission figures reported to the federal government, and do not include institutions with open admission, which take 100 percent of applicants.
This comes after a period of steadily increasing competition to get into college since around the turn of the millennium, which aggravated fears among students and their families that they'd be rejected by the institutions of their choice. Widely reported impossibly low single-digit acceptance rates at the nation's most highly selective universities and colleges only made that apprehension worse.
Not surprisingly, 45 percent of 18- to 29-year-olds think it's harder to get into college than it was for their parents' generation, a survey by the Pew Research Center found.
In fact, 87 percent of nonprofit four-year colleges in 2022 took half or more of the students who applied to them, up from 80 percent in 2012, the AEI study found.
"It's really a small proportion that are accepting only single-digit proportions of their applicants," said Preston Cooper, a senior fellow at AEI, who conducted the research. "You're going to get in somewhere, and you're going to get into somewhere decent."
Separate data from the National Association for College Admission Counseling, or NACAC, shows that 78 percent of first-year applicants to public and 70 percent to private colleges and universities get in. That's up from 68 percent and 65 percent, respectively, since 2014.
Being accepted to college "is easier than people think," said Melissa Clinedinst, NACAC's director of research initiatives and partnerships. "That's the message we've been trying to get out for years."
It's basic math. Enrollment has been going down for more than 10 years. Freshman enrollment this fall dropped by another 5 percent. And federal data show the number of high school graduates going directly to college has fallen from a high of 70 percent in 2015 to 62 percent in 2022, the most recent year for which the figure is available.
As fewer people apply, colleges are forced to accept a larger proportion of them. And with a projected decline in the number of 18-year-olds, Cooper said, it's likely that getting into college will continue to get easier.
The chances of getting into Fordham University rose from 43 percent to 54 percent between 2012 and 2022, federal data analyzed by The Hechinger Report found; into George Washington University, from 33 percent to 49 percent; into Hofstra, from 59 percent to 69 percent; into Indiana University Bloomington, from 74 percent to 82 percent; into Marquette, from 55 percent to 87 percent; and into Michigan State, from 71 percent to 88 percent.
Fordham spokesman Bob Howe said that university's acceptance rate went up, in part, because high school seniors are applying to more colleges, which "has required us to temporarily shift our acceptance rate."
At Indiana University Bloomington, spokesman Mark Bode said the higher acceptance rate was due partly to an increase in the size of entering classes. Bode provided data showing that standardized test scores and high school grade-point averages of admitted students have also gone up.
The other institutions did not respond to requests for comment.
The news for students isn't all good. To lock in the dwindling pool of customers, some universities and colleges are expanding their use of so-called early decision, which generally requires successful applicants to accept an offer of admission far earlier than the usual May 1 deadline.
That not only leaves fewer seats available through the general admission process, data from the Common Application shows; it also largely excludes low-income and first-generation students, who may not be aware of the option or can't afford to agree to an offer before learning how much institutional financial aid they'll get.
"There's just not a world where they can apply early decision to that institution without knowing whether or not they can afford it," said Karla Robles-Reyes, chief program officer at OneGoal, a nonprofit that provides advising and support to low-income students.
Many top schools take at least half of their students through early decision, including the University of Pennsylvania and Dartmouth, Brown, Cornell, Duke and Vanderbilt universities, according to Education Reform Now, which advocates for students from lower-income families.
Eighty-four selective universities and colleges admit a third or more of their students through early decision, and 55 of those have in the last few years increased the proportion who get in this way, Education Reform Now reports.
At Tulane, the proportion of applicants admitted through early decision rose from 28 percent in 2018 to 68 percent in 2022; at Grinnell, from 44 percent to 69 percent; and at Middlebury, from 58 percent to 69 percent, according to data each institution is required to disclose.
The perception that admission is hypercompetitive has historically worked in colleges' favor. Many hype their selectivity and benefit from the idea that they're exclusive. This also fuels an industry of private college counselors, tutors and test prep companies.
"Colleges do want to cultivate this idea that they're prestigious and selective, and you should want to pay a lot of money for them," said Cooper, of AEI."They like the idea of being a sought-after good."
That can discourage some young people from applying.
"We worry in general about the perception that college is harder to get into than it actually is, and that it might limit students' aspirations," said NACAC's Clinedinst.
Yet only 33 colleges or universities nationwide took 10 percent or fewer of the people who applied, according to NACAC.
At a few of those, the competition has gotten even tougher. Brown University accepted 5 percent of applicants in 2022, down from 17 percent in 2002, the AEI study found.
But most other institutions are getting easier to get into, not harder, Cooper found.
"If students internalize this message, that could reduce some of their anxiety," he said.
Jon Marcus wrote this article for The Hechinger Report.
Support for this reporting was provided by Lumina Foundation.
get more stories like this via email
State data first reported by EdSource show that fraudsters have stolen more than $7.5 million in student financial aid from California community colleges so far this year.
The theft amounts to less than one-tenth of 1% of student aid awarded in the Golden State.
Victor DeVore, dean of student services with the San Diego Community College District, said they use technology to flag suspicious applicants, and require them to submit proof of identity and residency, but it's still a game of cat and mouse.
"Last year, we had about 10,000 fraudulent applications that we blocked," said DeVore. "But even with that, every time we have some kind of metric or filter, the fraudsters are able to get through that."
The California Community College Chancellor's office says about 25% of applications are flagged as suspected fraud, up from 20% two years ago - as both fraud and its detection get more sophisticated.
The problem got worse during COVID as so many classes went online, making it difficult to require students to get financial aid checks in person.
The financial fraud means less money goes to students in need.
But Nicole Albo-Lopez, vice chancellor of educational programs and institutional effectiveness with the Los Angeles Community College District, said the enrollment fraud that goes with it has real consequences.
"The biggest frustration is when our classes are being filled by individuals that have no intention of actually attending the class," said Albo-Lopez, "keeping students from completing their educational goals within a preferred time frame, because they'll have to wait a semester or two to be able to take that class."
Many schools now require students to meet via zoom with staff trained to detect fraud - and they drop students who haven't verified their identity a few weeks before classes start.
Support for this reporting was provided by Lumina Foundation.
get more stories like this via email
Educators across the state are watching the University of North Texas, as the school denies it overstepped the parameters of Senate Bill 17.
The legislation went into effect in January and forbids public colleges and universities from having Diversity, Equity and Inclusion offices and programs.
The accusations were made after UNT faculty members realized the university changed course titles and class descriptions.
Brian Evans, Ph.D, president of the Texas Conference of the American Association of University Professors - said they first noticed the changes in May.
"You had about a couple of hundred of fall course syllabi that the UNT administration required instructors to scrub words like class, equity, and race," said Evans. "And then more recently - in October - the UNT administration censored over 200 courses in a similar way."
During a faculty senate meeting, UNT Provost Michael McPherson said the changes were not related to SB 17, but were an exercise to bring the College of Education into alignment with standardized testing.
Evans' organization, along with two other education groups, sent letters of concern to the university. He added that UNT administrators crossed a huge red line when they unilaterally censored course content.
"It appears that the UNT administration is doing the opposite of what Senate Bill 17 is saying," said Evans. "Senate Bill 17 was not about curriculum. Senate Bill 17 was about employment practices."
The groups want university administrators to reverse what they call the "scrubbing" of curriculum, stop censoring the professors work, and involve educators in any future changes to course work.
get more stories like this via email
Contact
