SANTA FE, N.M. -- There's no way to know how many people are experiencing homelessness during the coronavirus pandemic, but New Mexico's homeless advocates are encouraging the donation of sleeping bags and tents to help keep people safe.
New Mexico shelters that are already full have stopped accepting new clients, while a few are closed because they're too small to accommodate social distancing.
Hank Hughes, executive director of New Mexico Coalition to End Homelessness, says financial donations to purchase motel room vouchers are also encouraged, because now is the time for proactive measures.
"It seems like the virus has not hit the homeless community here yet, and so we have a little window of opportunity to try and get people into a safe place," he states. "I think it's safe to say that there's probably at least a thousand people in New Mexico sleeping outside right now."
New Mexico's stay-at-home order has been extended through May 15. The director of the state's Human Services Department says the decision was based on the latest modeling data of expected cases, adding that New Mexico has a much higher proportion of vulnerable people than almost all other states.
Hughes says donations to fund more motel vouchers will benefit all New Mexicans if the homeless population can be protected from the virus.
"Because one of the worst things that could happen not only for homeless people but to our communities would be to have a large group of people with no place to stay wandering around and spreading the virus among themselves and among the rest of us," he stresses.
The San Juan County commissioners last week discussed efforts to find a temporary homeless shelter to avoid putting those who test positive in contact with healthy people.
San Juan and McKinley counties in the Four Corners area of New Mexico have reported the most cases of COVID-19. Donations can be made at local shelters or to the New Mexico Coalition to End Homelessness at nmceh.org.
Disclosure: New Mexico Coalition to End Homelessness contributes to our fund for reporting on Domestic Violence/Sexual Assault, Housing/Homelessness. If you would like to help support news in the public interest,
click here.
get more stories like this via email
Backers of President Joe Biden's rent cap proposal said it could benefit many New Yorkers.
The plan calls for capping rent increases at 5% in apartments owned by corporate landlords, or those landlords risk losing federal tax breaks. It comes as statewide rents are rapidly increasing. As of this month, New York City rents are 147% higher than the national average.
Cea Weaver, campaign coordinator for the group Housing Justice For All, said capping rents could greatly benefit New Yorkers struggling with housing costs.
"Many New Yorkers are already benefiting from stronger protections than what Biden has called for," Weaver acknowledged. "But for places that haven't opted into rent stabilization, which is many, in upstate New York especially, this would be hugely important, since half the state rents an unregulated apartment and this is potentially a lifeline."
The rent cap plan will require approval from Congress. It includes the Department of Housing and Urban Development investing $325 million nationwide in "Choice Neighborhood" grants, to support building affordable homes across the country.
Syracuse received $50 million from the program to build 1,400 affordable units. It comes as 31,000 households in Onondaga County spend more than one-third of their income on housing.
Beyond Biden's plan, New York's own good cause eviction protections passed earlier this year can help tenants. Since becoming law in May, four cities have opted in to the program. Though some housing advocates were against making it optional, Weaver noted the protections it offers reverberate in cities taking advantage of it.
"Right now, tenants in New York State have the right to renew their lease unless their landlord has a good reason to deny a lease renewal," Weaver explained. "The statutory protection is to remain in their home. And there's a nix on rent increases if you're rent-stabilized; it depends on what your local rent board voted for."
She notes cities adopting good cause eviction protections are also protecting tenants from almost 9% rent increases. Rochester and some Hudson Valley cities are considering opting in to these protections.
get more stories like this via email
Newly released data in Minnesota underscores what housing assistance groups have been preaching - it's become increasingly difficult for many people to keep a roof over their heads.
Minnesota Housing Partnership is out with its latest edition of the State of the State's Housing report.
It says statewide, median rent increased by 8% in just one year - the largest year-to-year increase in the past decade.
And the group's Executive Director Anne Mavity pointed out that 50% of renters pay more for housing than they can afford. That means in some cases, other basic necessities fall by the wayside.
"And trying to maintain that housing," said Mavity, "means that families are making really hard choices."
Regionally, according to the report, Central Minnesota has the highest cost-burden rate for homeowners.
The Twin Cities has the largest shortage of affordable and available rental units for extremely low-income individuals.
The Northwest region has the lowest homeownership rate for Black and Hispanic residents.
Mavity said it'll take a little time for the $2 billion in housing aid approved by state lawmakers last year to help turn things around. She added that more solutions are needed.
Many areas have seen declines in permits for new housing. Mavity noted that market conditions, namely building costs, are pretty tough right now.
She emphasized the need for land-use reforms to foster creativity.
"If someone has a house, if they want to create a basement apartment for their parents to age in, if they want to have an apartment over their garage to get some income," said Mavity, "there are 23 states across the country that have done that. We can do better on that."
Amid heavy opposition from municipal leaders, proposed changes related to zoning failed to advance in this year's legislative session.
That was despite backing from a broad coalition of affordable housing advocates, real estate leaders, and home builders. Supporters say they'll try again next session.
get more stories like this via email
Half of Nevada voters feel their political leaders are ignoring the housing crisis.
Recent polling conducted by the Center for Popular Democracy and the Right to the City Alliance showed voters are growing more concerned about the housing issues plaguing Nevada.
Cinthia Moore, a Democratic candidate for Nevada Assembly from East Las Vegas who previously led the Nevada Environmental Justice Coalition, said Nevada attracts investors because the state does not have adequate protections in place for renters.
"As I am knocking on doors, a lot of people are doing month to month leases as a way to get more money out of our hardworking families," Moore observed. "That needs to stop."
Moore pointed out many longtime renters no longer have year-leases and their landlords have transitioned them to month-to-month agreements. She argued the move has allowed landlords to raise prices considerably, a practice she has vowed to put an end to if elected.
The poll found almost half of Nevada voters in the survey said they would vote for a candidate supporting government funding for affordable housing. Just over half said they would support a candidate who supports rent stabilization practices.
Sen. Edgar Flores, D-Las Vegas, said when it comes to the cost of housing, many in Nevada are making the difficult decisions to pay rent or make a mortgage payment rather than buying groceries or putting gas in their car. Nevada has made progress, including the passage of a law allocating funds for rental assistance in Clark, Reno and Sparks counties.
Flores said more needs to be done and lawmakers leading these housing-related legislative efforts should better understand the burden it places on families.
"There are people that are making laws that revolve around housing every single day that don't understand what a week means for a family, don't understand what it is to have to go and talk to somebody to just give you a little bit of an extra break," Flores emphasized. "I'm not saying that their families are wrong for that."
Flores stressed because of the lack of lived experience, lawmakers could be shortsighted or disconnected from the effects of policies on the most vulnerable. Flores added it is unfair wages and salaries have not grown in proportion to housing costs, making it a tough issue for Nevadans to grapple with on a daily basis.
get more stories like this via email