By Carrie Baker for Ms. Magazine.
Broadcast version by Roz Brown for Texas News Service reporting for the Ms. Magazine-Public News Service Collaboration

Over half of clinician-supervised abortions in the U.S. in 2020 were done with a combination of two medications: mifepristone and misoprostol. A Trump-appointed judge in Texas will soon decide a lawsuit brought by anti-abortion extremists asking him to force mifepristone off the market in all 50 states. If he does, as anticipated, reproductive rights advocates are ready to offer a safe and effective alternative to end pregnancy through three months: a higher dosage of misoprostol taken alone.

Misoprostol is a widely available ulcer medication that can induce a miscarriage by causing contractions of the uterus to expel a pregnancy. In the 1980s, Brazilian women began using misoprostol to end their pregnancies because abortion was unavailable through the medical system. Self-managed abortion with misoprostol resulted in precipitous declines in infection, hemorrhaging and death from unsafe abortion.

Today in countries where abortion is legally restricted, misoprostol is often used alone for self-managed abortion because it is inexpensive and widely available, often over the counter, unlike mifepristone.

Many studies from around the world have found that self-managed abortion with misoprostol alone is 93 to 99 percent effective and very safe. Because of the widespread availability of mifepristone in the United States, the use of the misoprostol alone for abortion had not been studied here, until recently.

On Feb. 6, researchers at the University of Texas at Austin published peer-reviewed research on the use of misoprostol alone for abortion. The research found that misoprostol alone was over 88 percent effective, with few incidents of serious adverse events or signs of potential abortion complications.

"This is the first U.S.-based study on misoprostol alone for self-managed abortion and it's coming at this critical time where we don't know what's going to happen with access to mifepristone," said the study's lead author, Dana M. Johnson, a Ph.D. candidate in public policy and demography at the University of Texas at Austin and a senior associate research scientist at Ibis Reproductive Health. "Our contribution with this study is to add to the broad evidence base we have from the international space on how safe and effective misoprostol is."

The research was based on data from the Vienna-based telemedicine abortion provider Aid Access, which provides telemedicine abortion services with pills in all 50 states in the U.S. Due to pandemic-related challenges shipping mifepristone, Aid Access prescribed misoprostol alone to over one thousand U.S.-based patients in June of 2020. Aid Access physicians either mailed misoprostol directly to patients or sent prescriptions to local pharmacies for pick-up.

"We took a very conservative approach by including just the people who had a totally confirmed, complete abortion at four weeks and didn't get a surgical intervention," said Johnson. "That is why our finding is 88 percent effectiveness, which is much lower than the SAFE Study from Ibis, which showed 98 percent effectiveness."

Published in November of 2021, the SAFE Study-which stands for Studying Accompaniment Feasibility and Effectiveness-showed that 98.8 percent of those who used the misoprostol-alone regimen had a complete abortion without surgical intervention. "SMA with misoprostol only is highly effective, and warrants renewed attention," it concludes, calling it "no longer a second-tier method, but one that offers similar effectiveness, and often greater accessibility, than the mifepristone and misoprostol regimen."

While this research shows misoprostol alone is a little less effective than the combination of mifepristone and misoprostol, extra doses of misoprostol can increase efficacy.

"We did take this conservative approach, but our findings were really, really good. There were very few people who had a serious adverse event. There were very few people who had any kind of treatment for that or a symptom of a potential complication," added Johnson.

Johnson is now conducting follow-up interviews with the research participants to understand their experiences of using misoprostol alone, which can be more difficult than the combination of mifepristone and misoprostol because the misoprostol-alone regimen calls for multiple doses of the medication, as opposed to one dose if combined with mifepristone. Those who use misoprostol alone may experience stronger cramping. Side effects from misoprostol can include nausea, fever, chills, vomiting and diarrhea, which can be more severe when taking misoprostol alone because of the higher dosage.

Johnson is finding in her research that women's experiences of using misoprostol are shaped by their mindset and how prepared they felt. Many found information on Reddit.com. The abortion Subreddit is curated by OARS (Online Abortion Resource Squad) with trained, expert volunteers who "ensure that every Reddit post asking for abortion-related help gets a quality, accurate, compassionate answer and referral to resources."

"People asked a lot of questions and that brought a sense of comfort because if you know that you can prep your hot water bottle or your ibuprofen or your chamomile tea, you're going into it with a little bit more of a mindset that you can manage this pain," said Johnson.

Research from other countries has shown that patients can have positive abortion experiences with misoprostol alone when they have access to the information they need, feel prepared for what they will experience and are supported through the process.

If the Texas court imposes a nationwide ban on mifepristone, women and pregnant people can still access the highly effective and medically safe method to end an early pregnancy with misoprostol alone. And unlike mifepristone, misoprostol is inexpensive and widely available by prescription for different indications in pharmacies throughout the U.S.

While the FDA has not labeled misoprostol for abortion, U.S.-based providers can prescribe the medication off label for this use to patients in states where abortion remains legal. Many telemedicine abortion providers have already pledged to offer misoprostol off label to their patients if mifepristone is removed from the market, including Abortion on Demand, Aid Access, carafem, Choix, Forward Midwifery, Hey Jane and Just the Pill. Planned Parenthood has also said they will offer this service.

National Abortion Federation's clinical practice guidelines suggest offering misoprostol alone where mifepristone combination is not accessible. The World Health Organization also has guidelines for misoprostol alone as a safe and effective options for abortion care. According to these guidelines, women in the first 12 weeks of pregnancy dissolve four 200 mg of misoprostol between their gum and cheek, three times at three-hour intervals.

"With clinical options for abortion severely limited post-Dobbs, these guidelines are important in affirming self-managed abortion as a safe and essential practice that can be empowering for those seeking to end a pregnancy," concluded the U.T. Austin study authors. "There is potential for its use in the U.S. as a method of ensuring reproductive autonomy, especially for populations who have been systematically cut off from safe, affordable and non-coercive reproductive healthcare services."

Carrie Baker wrote this article for Ms. Magazine.



get more stories like this via email

Vice President Kamala Harris focused on reproductive rights at a campaign event in Michigan Wednesday.

Her remarks come as President Joe Biden has fallen behind former President Donald Trump in the state, according to the latest polls. In front of a crowd of hundreds, Harris stressed abortion rights are at risk if Republicans win in November. She said Biden has vowed to veto any attempts to ban abortion nationwide.

"We believe in freedom. Freedom from the government telling us what to do about matters of heart and home," Harris explained. "We believe in the right of people to make basic decisions, like when and if they will start a family and how."

Meanwhile, Trump's pick for vice president, Sen. JD Vance, R-Ohio, has supported national abortion bans and opposed exceptions for rape and incest. Democrats are hoping the distinction will lead them to a victory this year in the key battleground state of Michigan. It was a critical issue for voters in 2022, when Gov. Gretchen Whitmer won her reelection race easily and both chambers of the state legislature flipped to Democrats for the first time in decades.

In her speech, Harris condemned political violence following the recent attempted shooting of Donald Trump at a Pennsylvania political rally. She also praised the gun safety measures Michigan lawmakers passed in recent years, including universal background checks and safe storage requirements. She added politicians in Washington, D.C., should favor similar laws.

"The solutions don't really require that much creativity," Harris asserted. "What they do require is people in the United States Congress to have courage to act and do what we know is the right thing to do and not cower, based on special interests and powerful lobbyists."

One Michigan Democrat in Congress, Rep. Hillary Scholten, D-Grand Rapids, has called on Biden to drop out of the presidential race over concerns about his age and cognitive ability. Harris would likely be a top replacement choice in the race against Trump.


get more stories like this via email

Abortion bans and restrictions limit women's participation in the workforce, according to a new analysis that quantifies the negative impacts on state economies.

South Dakota saw an average loss in GDP of nearly 1% per year between 2021 and 2023, due to a drop in labor force participation by people who became pregnant and didn't have access to abortion care, according to data from the Institute for Women's Policy Research. That adds up to nearly $641 million in economic losses to the state.

Jamila Taylor, president and CEO of the Institute for Women's Policy Research, said the 16 states with abortion bans or extreme restrictions, including South Dakota, are costing the national economy $68 billion annually.

"Not only do these restrictions and bans have a clear impact on the health and well being of people with the ability to get pregnant, they also have an impact on their productivity and their economic position in life," Taylor said.

Taylor added abortion access not only helps family finances, but also allows women ages 15 to 44 to engage more broadly in society -- in local communities or politics, for example.

Despite restrictions, abortion numbers are rising. The first full calendar year after the Dobbs decision overturned Roe v. Wade saw an 11% increase in abortions since 2020 - or over one million abortions in the formal health care system in 2023, according to The Guttmacher Institute.

If voters pass South Dakota's constitutional Amendment G in November, it will enshrine protections to abortion.

Hannah Haksgaard, University of South Dakota law professor, said even if it passes, people seeking an in-state abortion would likely see a lag time before services become available.

"There would still likely be state legislation that would try to restrict abortion in certain ways, and then the question would become whether those restrictions violated the new constitutional amendment," she said.

Haksgaard added that could make providers move slowly on offering abortion services in the state, until the legal issues are settled.


get more stories like this via email

A ruling from the U.S. Supreme Court Thursday will allow for abortions in emergency situations in Idaho - for now.

The justices said they were dismissing an appeal, reestablishing a lower court decision allowing hospitals to perform abortions in emergency cases, despite the state's restrictive abortion laws.

Molly Meegan, chief legal officer for the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, said the organization is glad to see temporary relief in this case but added it is far from a complete solution.

"The way these laws are set up in Idaho and elsewhere are that there are limits on what care can be provided," Meegan explained. "Those limits are not clearly defined, and they're not committed to the discretion, the judgment, the expertise and the training of the physician that's facing a particular patient."

The protection for emergency abortions stems from a federal law known as the Emergency Medical Treatment and Labor Act. The law requires Medicare-funded hospitals to perform abortions in emergency situations. The three dissenting justices in Thursday's case called the Act's ability to preempt Idaho's restrictive abortion laws "plainly unsound."

Dr. Stella Dentas, president of the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, said there is still a lack of clarity around the law in Idaho and OB/GYNs are leaving the state as a result. She noted when doctors face the prospect of jail over restrictive laws like Idaho's, it makes their job more difficult in emergency situations.

"It's already hard enough to make these critical decisions in the moment," Dentas emphasized. "If you're stuck on, 'OK, I can go down path A, but I'm not allowed to go down path B,' that is very confusing for both clinicians and the patients and the shared decision-making that we do."

Meegan added legislators should not be determining what care is available to patients.

"These questions need to be decided by science, by evidence, by the individual case in front of you," Meegan contended. "The idea that you can have black and white worlds being created by people without the expertise, training or experiencing the emergencies is really fundamentally dangerous."


get more stories like this via email