Advocacy groups in Kentucky say they're focused on expanding voting rights for former felons and fighting gerrymandering ahead of the May primary election.

A new report by the Sentencing Project finds more than 198,000 Kentuckians are barred from voting due to a past felony conviction. That's despite a 2019 executive order to expand voting rights for people with certain types of convictions.

Debra Graner - voting rights advocate with Kentuckians for the Commonwealth - pointed out that since 2019, only 17% percent of Kentuckians with a past felony on their record have successfully submitted a voting application.

"It's a right, we need to have that protection," said Graner. "A healthy democracy is one in which people are allowed to vote."

The report says Kentucky has the country's third-highest rate of disenfranchisement for Latino residents, and the sixth-highest for Black residents.

Lawmakers are considering a number of election-related bills this session. They include House Bill 68, to extend voting hours until 7 pm on Election Day, and Senate Bill 44, which would ban protests or vigils on government property, and increase criminal penalties for people involved in protests.

Dee Pregliasco, vice president with the Kentucky League of Women Voters, said the census and redistricting are closely tied to voting rights. She noted the redistricting maps lawmakers recently passed are being challenged in court.

"If the districts are drawn to protect the incumbents, that doesn't help us, the voters," said Pregliasco. "We should be choosing who represents us."

A group of Franklin County residents and the Kentucky Democratic Party, have filed a lawsuit charging that the new maps are unconstitutional and gerrymandered. Republican lawmakers disagree, and say the new maps reflect population shifts revealed in the latest census data.

A new report highlighted how the U.S. compares globally in disenfranchising people based on criminal convictions.

The study analyzed 136 countries and found most countries do not deny voting rights due to convictions.

Trey Walk, democracy researcher and advocate for Human Rights Watch and the report's co-author, said it makes the U.S. one of the strictest in denying rights for justice-impacted citizens. He explained what other countries are doing to ensure voting rights are eventually restored.

"There are countries that have time-bound restrictions, so they may remove the right to vote during incarceration," Walk pointed out. "Immediately upon release, those rights are restored."

He noted other countries impose temporary voting restrictions, removing the right to vote for a few years before restoring it. Only five countries have permanent disenfranchisement. Overall the U.S. bans more than 4.4 million citizens from voting due to felony convictions.

The report also highlighted felony disenfranchisement laws as major obstacles to justice for communities of color. In North Carolina about 83,000 people are disenfranchised. Walk argued it is important for democracy people regain the right so they can have a say in issues affecting them.

"Having more people who have been impacted by a criminal legal system and just more people who fully represent the community have the right to vote, that decides outcomes and that allows us to elect candidates who will uphold our rights," Walk contended.

To overcome some of the current barriers, the report recommended measures such as changing laws to make voting more accessible and creating polling centers in correctional facilities to improve access. The report also urged the U.S. to abolish "pay to vote" practices, which require payment of court fees and fines before voting rights can be restored.


get more stories like this via email

A new South Dakota law will give poll watchers in the state more power on Election Day. Some say that could interfere with voting.

A bill passed in March requires that polling places be arranged so that poll watchers - who are sometimes nominated by political parties - may 'plainly see and hear what is done in the polling place.'

A violation by a poll worker - a nonpartisan local trained for the role - is now a class two misdemeanor.

Andrew Garber - counsel for the Voting Rights and Elections Program at the Brennan Center for Justice - said while poll watchers are important, giving them disproportionate power could lead to voter intimidation, poll worker harassment, and misinformation.

"When poll workers can be subject to criminal penalties, it means that poll watchers are going to feel empowered to push the boundaries," said Garber. "And in some cases, people are no longer going to want to serve as poll workers if they're more likely to face harassments or fear criminal prosecution."

Garber said it can also slow down voting and vote counting. The Republican National Committee says increased monitoring ensures transparency.

Other voting laws passed this year - according to the Brennan Center - include seven restrictive laws in six states, and 14 expansive laws across 11 states.

Two out of three Americans are concerned about political violence following Election Day, according to a recent survey.

Garber said it's important for voters to know that interference is possible, but it's unlikely.

"The reality is most voters will have a really positive voting experience," said Garber. "They shouldn't be worried that someone is going to come out and intimidate them or make things very difficult."

In the small chance of a disruption, Garber said voters should report it to election officials.

Support for this reporting was provided by the Carnegie Corporation of New York.




get more stories like this via email

Newly introduced federal legislation aims to protect voters from the growing threat of political ads generated by artificial intelligence.

Manipulated audio of Vice President Kamala Harris' voice spread widely on social media is just the latest example of a so-called "deepfake" designed to sow confusion ahead of the November election.

Richard Anthony, emerging technologies policy director for the consumer advocacy group Public Citizen, said disruptive AI content in recent European elections revealed the urgent need for action.

"Those incidents were just testing grounds for a big, huge torrent coming our way over the next few months," Anthony predicted.

Anthony explained bipartisan legislation would prohibit the use of AI content for certain political ads and require disclaimers on content substantially generated by AI. Robocalls using AI are already illegal, after a misleading "deepfake" of President Joe Biden before the New Hampshire primary.

Lawmakers say without clear regulations, "deepfakes" could be used to distort election results and widen partisan divides. Earlier this year, tech companies signed a pact to voluntarily prevent AI from disrupting democratic elections but Anthony argued it was largely symbolic and failed to commit companies to banning or removing deceptive content.

He stressed it is important voters be aware of bad actors and if they see a political ad, always check its source.

"Definitely do double-takes on any video, any audio file you see or hear online," Anthony urged.

In the absence of federal rules, eighteen states, including New Hampshire, have already passed laws on AI "deepfakes." Bills are pending in six others.

The Federal Communications Commission has also proposed a rule to require clear disclaimers on AI generated political ads in broadcasting. The public can submit comments though Aug. 12.

Support for this reporting was provided by The Carnegie Corporation of New York.


get more stories like this via email