TALLAHASSEE, Fla. -- Laid-off workers are appealing to Gov. Ron DeSantis to reverse plans to terminate a federal pandemic assistance program that added a $300 per week boost to the state's unemployment benefits.

Jim Ricer owned a thriving catering business called "Gourmet to You," with which his team delivered meals to businesses, for 19 years. When the pandemic shut down corporate offices, Ricer found himself instantly out of business.

On top of it all, he said he only qualifies for federal unemployment benefits, which the DeSantis administration plans to end on June 26. Ricer thinks the move is all political, and said he feels like a pawn.

"It's hard, it's hard to be strong for my 15-year-old daughter, you know," Ricer explained. "'Cause you can't let them know that you're struggling, and it does, it does hit me in the heart, it's very personal."

A growing number of Republican-led states have withdrawn from the federal program, claiming it will be an incentive to get people back to work.

However, Ricer thinks the move will only add more pain and stress to families like his, and he's backing an online petition by the Florida-AFL-CIO, to try to convince the governor to change course.

Karen Woodall, executive director of the Florida Center for Fiscal and Economic Policy at the Florida People's Advocacy Center, said Florida could lose out even more on economic activity if it withdraws from the federal program.

"It's money that goes into the economy," Woodall pointed out. "People pay rent, people get gas, people, you know, they are not taking it and sticking it in a savings account, so it's just out of touch with the struggles that people continue to go through in Florida."

A study from the Century Foundation, a progressive think tank, showed the change could impact more than 116,000 Florida workers, ending roughly $418 million in benefits. Some estimate the change could pull about $700 million in stimulus out of the economy.

With the removal of federal help, unemployed workers in Florida can only receive a maximum of $275 per week, which is among the lowest benefits in the country.

Unionized workers with the federal agency responsible for processing immigration and asylum paperwork claim they are being forced to turn their jobs over to non-union labor, in violation of federal law.

United Electrical, Radio, & Machine Workers of America members say the U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services Nebraska Service Center is laying off union workers in Nebraska and other states, and moving the jobs to non-union operations.

UE Local 808 President Dawn Meyer calls the center's move "union busting."

"What they are doing is, they're taking good union jobs," said Meyer. "They're outsourcing them to places that are paying less money, are less efficient, are far less vigilant in accuracy. They're risking people's ability to get immigration benefits."

Meyer said UE workers are a skilled, experienced workforce that performs clerical and pre-adjudication tasks.

They serve the immigration pipeline for asylum seekers, refugees, and victims of human trafficking and domestic violence.

The U.S. CIS did not respond to a request for comment.

Meyer said the U.S. CIS is playing a "shell game," laying off union workers and moving their jobs to the non-union Lockbox location in Dallas.

The work there principally involves the processing of fee-bearing petitions. She said the decision to relocate this work has resulted in predictable delays in processing.

"All these contracts are supposed to be open to the public because SCA is supposed to be a transparent process," said Meyer. "So it makes it very difficult for the common person to go looking for, 'Hey, what's my government doing?'"

UE locals in Lincoln, Essex, Vermont, and Laguna Niguel, California have recently held protests of the layoff policies - calling for the government to stop so-called "rolling layoffs," aimed at reducing the unionized workforce at all three locations by about two thirds between 2023 and 2025.


get more stories like this via email

New data show fast food jobs have been on the upswing in the four months since the minimum wage in the sector went from $16 to $20 an hour.

The Bureau of Labor Statistics found California added 11,000 new fast-food jobs from April to July and showed increases year over year each month since January.

Michael Reich, professor of economics at the University of California-Berkeley, said the data contradicts doomsday predictions from opponents of raising the minimum wage.

"The knock is that a minimum wage increase would lead to businesses closing, workers getting laid off, and much higher prices," Reich recounted. "That's been the knock on every minimum wage increase since 1938. Indeed, a large number of studies have found that minimum wages do not reduce employment in fast food."

Reich noted while fast food work is expanding, its growth has slowed because overall economic growth has slowed but not because of the higher minimum wage. He said the effect of higher fast-food workers' wages on the overall economy is too small to detect.

Reich pointed out higher wages have certainly benefited workers' bottom line, which leads to more spending in the local economy. They have also led to slightly higher restaurant prices.

"Fast food prices may have gone up one or two percent, compared to how much they increased in other states that did not raise their minimum wage," Reich explained. "That's not enough to reduce consumer spending. So the minimum wage essentially leads to an income transfer from the people who eat in those restaurants to the people who work in those restaurants."

Some individual fast food managers worried they would lose business if they increased their prices to offset higher labor costs. But Reich countered the cost increases affect all fast food restaurants, so individual businesses would not lose market share.


get more stories like this via email

AT&T customers may experience service disruptions as the worker's union, Communications Workers of America, initiates a strike to try to continue their negotiations with AT&T through what they claim is "bad faith" bargaining. The CWA, representing employees in the Southeast, has voiced concerns over AT&T's approach to new contract negotiations, citing issues related to health-care costs and decision-making at the bargaining table.

Michael Devane, president of CWA Local 3104 in Fort Lauderdale, expressed frustration with the company's representatives.

"Just basically kicking the can down the road. You know, just humoring people just going through the motions. Not really bargaining seriously. So District 3 filed an unfair labor practice charge against them, and that's why we are out on strike right now for that," he said.

"We remain committed to reaching a fair agreement with CWA District 3, and we have offered to bring in a federal mediator to ensure there is no question about either side's commitment to this process," AT&T said in a statement.

The company also assured customers that "business continuity measures are in place so that we can continue to provide our customers with the great service they deserve."

CWA members across the country will hold up signs at work on Thursday to show their solidarity.

One of several sticking points in the negotiations is the health-care plan. According to the CWA, AT&T is pushing for cost structures based on the company's national average, which does not reflect the lower health-care costs in the Southeast. Devane hopes for a good-faith effort by the company to negotiate.

"Well, I'd like to get this thing moving along there. There has to be some adults in the room and please get back to the table and let's get this thing done. We all have families. We take care of and company as customers. They got to take care of, and we'd like to get back to normal," he said.

As the union and company remain at an impasse, AT&T has proposed entering federal mediation. Customers in the region may experience service delays, as AT&T is currently operating with a reduced workforce during the ongoing strike.


get more stories like this via email